pauly989 said: Isn;t there a danger that if 360 games are trying so hard to compete with ps3 in the graphics departments that other things will start to get sacrificed due to the limited dvd storage? If the 360 has better graphical properties then how come the best looking games are on the ps3 despite it being out a year later. The PS3 will always have the advantage get over it. |
the 360 doesn't have better graphical properties, whoever said that is wrong. it has abetter gpu (graphics processor) but the psr's cpu is better and more advanced then the one of the the 360 ( the xenon cpu) which includes three "cores" one is a gpu ( the gpu is part of the cpu) and the other cores take care of whatever specific jobs they have. the ps3 has a gpu and a cpu with 1 core 8 subsections one which doesn't do anything and is their for ( i have no idea), the "core" has specific jobs, ps3 multiplats only use the work, it has a big role, but it's the 7 sub sections which it possible to use all of the power of the ps3 and making it graphically superior to the ps3. that is why it takes more time developing on the ps3 because of those 7 subsections ( which sony paid 400 million dollars to aqquire that technology, we can say it was a failed investment sales wise) and that is why games like kz2, uc2,mgs4,gow3, are better then all multiplats on the ps3, and are in the top 5 games graphicly ( gears of war 2 joins them).