I couldn't watch the video too long. Her cleavage looks disturbing for some reason.
Samus Aran said:
This law doesn't affect society negativly. Only for the fact that the total amount of women wearing burqa's in belgium is less then a 100 and most people are against burqa's here. The least racist countries in the Western world are Scandinavian countries for sure. You know, Europeans. Greece and Italy are a lot more racist then France, so why do you keep on hammering on the French? Christianity, Islam and Judism are sexist religions no matter how you spin it(please note that I didn't call Christians, Muslims or Jews sexists). People who wear burqa's are die hard Muslims and there for they will not tolerate gay people(just an example) Like I said, tolerance is a two way street. Don't complain that someone is intolerant against you while you're being intolerant as well. That would make you a hypocrite
|
Why france? Because France tries policies like this. Which FAIL and are negatives to society. These laws DO affect society negativly, additionally if less then 100 women where burqas... why is their a law needed to ban them? Most people being against the burqa is COMPLETLY irrelvent. Most people are against burqas anywhere. It's laws like this that let racists and sexists maintain their beliefs under the claims of persecution by the government.

Also, this doesn't even adress the problem that your hurting the women who are forced to wear Buqkas.
Ok, so you ban the Burqa... what then? The women who chose to wear Burqas don't anymore. The women who are forced to wear them... are still forced to wear them. What happens the laws punish them, the victims. Not those who force them to wear Burqas. Or even worse... the men simply forbid the women from ever leaving their homes. Yeah, those women are really helped by this.

I wish the burqa didn't exist. But it does.
I don't care if a woman wears it unless they need to show their identity to the authorities. At which point securalism prevails.
I do think the burqa represents religious opression of women but as much as it distrubs me that a women would need to wear such a concealing outfit I think it puts us in muddy water if theirs an outright ban.
Thankfully most muslim women don't wear them.
Kasz216 said:
If someone wants to come into a bank or airport with a buqa or mask or whatever, they should be searched, and forced to show their face and ID to one of the security guards on duty and matched with an ID in a seperate room. Banning the Burqa is a strike against ALL woman's rights to try and save a very small minority... even of those who wear burqas. Here's an idea... target abusive husbands instead. Do something that will actually improve peoples lives.
Also yes. If someone says "Homosexuals should die!" You tolerate it. By calling him a moron, an asshole and suggesting the boycott of any buisness that hires or supports him. You use society to condemn people and force them to either change or be ostricized, rather then hide and pretend it doesn't exist. |
But that is the point where this ban came from...the women did not allow a search even in an seperate room. If those women allowed it their probably would not have been a ban in the first place.
Well how would you target abusive husbands? Put a camera in the house? Yeah sorry just don't know how you are going to do that. Their enough centre's where women can go when they want to flee from their husband. For an Belgian women it is okay to do...but for a muslim women it is difficult especially when their is a chance that the islam community would not tolerate it and that she would put their god to shame... What they need is someone from the Islam community who stands up for the women but in the end they need bodyguards to secure their safety so far goes freedom of speech.
Yeah they were even politician(s) who called them idiots he is been shot to dead....And with an interview of what the Islam youth thinks about it you get only answers as 'It is good he is been shot to dead because no one should say something like that about an moslim'..... Stop supporting the leader of Sharia4Belgium will only end up with someone else standing up even if they have make a new organization.
| Kasz216 said: Also, this doesn't even adress the problem that your hurting the women who are forced to wear Buqkas. Ok, so you ban the Burqa... what then? The women who chose to wear Burqas don't anymore. The women who are forced to wear them... are still forced to wear them. What happens the laws punish them, the victims. Not those who force them to wear Burqas. Or even worse... the men simply forbid the women from ever leaving their homes. Yeah, those women are really helped by this. |
Do you know why they wear burqa's? If they were forced inside their house they wouldn't need burqa's unless someone pays them a visit. I don't see the problem if they're forced to stay inside. They're out of society then, so it doesn't affect it. People who wear burqa's are out of society anyway as they're not allowed to do a thing.
And don't the anti gay laws in the USA affect society negatively? They do, on a bigger scale then this thing. In what Western country can you sue someone for $16000 because his dead son was gay and in the army? Only in the USA 
Don't the crazy gun laws affect society in a bad way in the USA? THEY DO, I'd rather not eat in a restaurant filled with people wearing a loaded gun.
I'd rather go to France then USA. I can tell you that.
Do you honestly think Belgium cares for extremist Muslims? Not when they're trying to turn our law into the sharia lol. The site is probably of the air already, but if it isn't: www.Belgium4sharia.com
Samus...It is not because Kasz216 is from the USA he agrees with the gay laws or the right to have a gun laws. Anyway a reaction like that will not lead to an civil discussion.
I personally would be very dissapointed in you Samus if you go on like that.
| Lostplanet22 said: Samus...It is not because Kasz216 is from the USA he agrees with the gay laws or the right to have a gun laws. Anyway a reaction like that will not lead to an civil discussion. I personally would be very dissapointed in you Samus if you go on like that. |
No, but he did drag his country in to one of his posts. As if the USA is a place that we should all look up to. I don't like that. And I've also noticed that a lot of people seem to hate France on this site. If you want to talk about racism&sexism in Europe then Greece and Italy are a WAY BETTER example then France.
As far as I'm aware the Quran says nothing on the Burqa. The most women should cover up is their hair. The Burqa itself is cultural, not religious.
I'm divided on the topic. Not sure banning it is the way to go but I don't like the idea of the Burqa in general.
deathgod33 said:
now which woman is more likely to get raped? a women wearing a mini-skirt, or one wearing a burqa? and im not sure if men are superior to women, but i do believe that men and women aren't equal. |
As far as I'm aware from my muslim friends, women only need to cover their hair and not their face completely. The Burqa is more a cultural symobol than a religious one. And protection is a poor excuse based off of fear and oppression. Every man is a potential rapist then? And just showing a face is enough for them to wildly get the horn and go rape women? Give me a break.