I haven't played Mass Effect 2 yet, but I definitely would like to play this game in the future. All the reviews and gameplay videos have been stellar.
That said, the reason I don't want to play Mass Effect 2 is because I haven't played Mass Effect 1. The majority of people out there have claimed that one shouldn't play Mass Effect 2 without first playing the 1st game. But is this statement harming Bioware's sales of Mass Effect 2?
ME2 sales have dropped like a rocket in the past few weeks, and the game is no longer in the top 50 best selling games. ME2 is already dropped to $40 in several major retailers. Is ME2 a completely front-loaded game that is going to be completely reliant only on the fans that bought ME1? This is not a good predictament for BioWare. Sequels should grow a fanbase. Recent successful sequels include Uncharted 2, Assasins Creed 2, and Modern Warfare 2. None of these games required someone to play the 1st game to understand the story.
Trilogies can be wonderful, but investing 20-40 hours is alot of time to impose to new fans of a series. There are only so many hardcore fans out there. A good portion of my gaming friends like the idea of RPGs, but don't want to play them because they are so time-consuming. They will only play the occasional great RPG such as Zelda or Final Fantasy.
Trilogy movies only involve a couple of hours of time to be caught up. Video games take much longer. I applaud BioWare for the innovative concept, but also wonder how much this is going to effect their long-term sales.
I know ME2 can be played without playing the first game 1st, but most fans of the ME series actively dissaude people from playing this way. This hardcore nature of ME, may also be a big hindrance to overall sales. The other hindrance, from what a certain ME fan told me, is that ME has a lot of annoying gameplay issues that turn off several people.
Most anticipated games of 2011:
Uncharted 3,Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword, Rocksmith
Modern Warfare 3, Super Mario 3D