By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - was home released way too early?

Because it seems like most of you people played home once when it first came out, lost interest and never went back to it. The first impression was too crappy to go back to imo. but if you play it again it is soo much better. so what do you guys think?



Around the Network

Probably.. I still think it's pretty shallow.. I go on occasionally if I'm really bored but I mean they could add a lot more incentives to go on, whether it be exclusive and addictive arcade style games with depth or competitions, really good competitions though.



 

puffy said:
Probably.. I still think it's pretty shallow.. I go on occasionally if I'm really bored but I mean they could add a lot more incentives to go on, whether it be exclusive and addictive arcade style games with depth or competitions, really good competitions though.

But then people would stop buying games which would hurt Sony :)



I think it was announced too early.



I don't have a PS3... but I really never saw the point of Home...



OoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoO

Around the Network

1/ yes too early

2/ UTERLY badly designed, they tried to bring "second life" is the PS3 but they completely forget entertainement ... too bad for them



Time to Work !

wen it first came out it was quite bare bones, but logging on now it has much more content and is much more lively.

as a quick example, if the bowling alley alone was released on xbox live in where you can meet others buddies with your avatars and play pool bowling online coop etc, people would deffo buy it.

so taken as a whole i think its pretty good as its not costing you anything.



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...