I agree with all you said in the OP.

But now is the Nintendo turn to say "So you said shit about me and in the end of the day you're just following my steps eh?"

If I was a PR at Nintendo I would be even more nasty to the point of referring in the interview the lag in Natal Camera and the lack of precision of the demos on the "superior" technology of PS Move.

Let the man do his job.

Um I dunno.....anything other than that?

"Well we definitely see that our competitors are adding motion controls to their consoles. We feel however that with our huge installed base and with stronger support for WiiMotionPlus on the way, that we'll be able to continue to add value to our consumers' experiences with the Wii at a very affordable price point."

Done. You pimp Nintendo, bring up more MotionPlus support, without even saying a peep about Sony or Microsoft other than in very quick passing.

TheGameFather said: Garnett said: Sempuukyaku said: Garnett said: Carl2291 said: Just like Nintendo will be embarrassed when they go HD! Innovation at its finest...   We did HD like what 4-5 years go?   We are doing motion controls now, Nintendo needs to move on and go HD and get with the times. Yeah, Nintendo needs to "get with the times", because Wii sales are very weak.     Anyway, this is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. How does Nintendo counter statements like these? With results. Period. No need to smack talk. Well if there was only one HD console out it would outsell the Wii. Except PCs have been HD for since before any console ever wuz?   HD isn't an innovation, its the natural progression of things...  The most obvious, thoughtless and visionless of natural progression choices at that.

Were not talking about PC's, i cant connect my PC to my 32 inch TV.

Were talking about Consoles that play games first and everything else.

Maynard_Tool said: Carl2291 said: Just like Nintendo will be embarrassed when they go HD! Hahahahaha oh my, funny..... but still, not very smart

It was a joke dude. Carl is not a cheap troll on VGChartz :)

Go easy on him.

Garnett said: TheGameFather said: Garnett said: Sempuukyaku said: Garnett said: Carl2291 said: Just like Nintendo will be embarrassed when they go HD! Innovation at its finest...   We did HD like what 4-5 years go?   We are doing motion controls now, Nintendo needs to move on and go HD and get with the times. Yeah, Nintendo needs to "get with the times", because Wii sales are very weak.     Anyway, this is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. How does Nintendo counter statements like these? With results. Period. No need to smack talk. Well if there was only one HD console out it would outsell the Wii. Except PCs have been HD for since before any console ever wuz?   HD isn't an innovation, its the natural progression of things...  The most obvious, thoughtless and visionless of natural progression choices at that. Were not talking about PC's, i cant connect my PC to my 32 inch TV.   Were talking about Consoles that play games first and everything else.

Really man? I'd beg to differ considering I'm using a laptop connected via a VGA cable to my 42" TV to make this post. LOL.

Reggie saying this sounds weird,but, I understand.

 Reggie is about kicking ass and taking names, not PC BS.

How quickly they forget.

We're talking about Sony feeling embarrased about being forced to copy Nintendo yet again.

But yeah you can actually hook er up to the 32", and you should.  I have my PC hooked up to my 42" and it destroys both the HD consoles and television at the same time.

L.C.E.C. said: Garnett said: TheGameFather said: Garnett said: Sempuukyaku said: Garnett said: Carl2291 said: Just like Nintendo will be embarrassed when they go HD! Innovation at its finest...   We did HD like what 4-5 years go?   We are doing motion controls now, Nintendo needs to move on and go HD and get with the times. Yeah, Nintendo needs to "get with the times", because Wii sales are very weak.     Anyway, this is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. How does Nintendo counter statements like these? With results. Period. No need to smack talk. Well if there was only one HD console out it would outsell the Wii. Except PCs have been HD for since before any console ever wuz?   HD isn't an innovation, its the natural progression of things...  The most obvious, thoughtless and visionless of natural progression choices at that. Were not talking about PC's, i cant connect my PC to my 32 inch TV.   Were talking about Consoles that play games first and everything else. Really man? I'd beg to differ considering I'm using a laptop connected via a VGA cable to my 42" TV to make this post. LOL.

Also, people talk about "HD" as if it's actually something, well, different. It's just a name for a range of resolutions, just as SD or ED. Things like "full HD" are so meaningless I've played game with way more pixels than that even before this generation launched. HD doesn't mean squat and basically every generation got a resolution upgrade, way before Sony or Microsoft even entered the buisness. It's just as innovative as adding more RAM to a PC ¬¬

Farmageddon said: L.C.E.C. said: Garnett said: TheGameFather said: Garnett said: Sempuukyaku said: Garnett said: Carl2291 said: Just like Nintendo will be embarrassed when they go HD! Innovation at its finest...   We did HD like what 4-5 years go?   We are doing motion controls now, Nintendo needs to move on and go HD and get with the times. Yeah, Nintendo needs to "get with the times", because Wii sales are very weak.     Anyway, this is EXACTLY what I'm talking about. How does Nintendo counter statements like these? With results. Period. No need to smack talk. Well if there was only one HD console out it would outsell the Wii. Except PCs have been HD for since before any console ever wuz?   HD isn't an innovation, its the natural progression of things...  The most obvious, thoughtless and visionless of natural progression choices at that. Were not talking about PC's, i cant connect my PC to my 32 inch TV.   Were talking about Consoles that play games first and everything else. Really man? I'd beg to differ considering I'm using a laptop connected via a VGA cable to my 42" TV to make this post. LOL. Also, people talk about "HD" as if it's actually something, well, different. It's just a name for a range of resolutions, just as SD or ED. Things like "full HD" are so meaningless I've played game with way more pixels than that even before this generation launched. HD doesn't mean squat and basically every generation got a resolution upgrade, way before Sony or Microsoft even entered the buisness. It's just as innovative as adding more RAM to a PC ¬¬

Then how is a natural, logical progression towards virtual reality any different? Ahh yes.  Nintendo released it, so it's some undiscovered gem.   Games have always tried to place you in the middle of the action. Making some waggle wand doesn't magically scream innovation.  The technology has been out there for quite some time.

Nintendo makes me laugh.  Suddenly everything they do is the gospel.  Yet the N64-Gamecube years produced about a number of games you could count on two hands that were worthwhile entries.

Wake me up when Nintendo physically 'invents' something worthwhile.