The only thing I see that Wii imitated PS2 at, was conquering the market leadership for this generation.

Aside from that I don't see your point :\

I didn't mean to downplay it, I know it's very accurate. But I'd still much rather stick to PC for RTS games. That's all.

Because you're missinformed about gaming my friend :)

1998 says hi

Sorry for the offtopic. Its enough already.

So you're telling me it has similar capabilities to the Eyetoy/PSEye?

And fyi, I've been playing games that have released before 1990. Before Nintendo, Sega, or Sony came into the picture.

Motion controllers are a step up from the dual analog gamepad but cannot compare to a mouse + keyboard.

@ huaxiong90

All I know is that it is a camera introduced in gaming before the eyetoy =)
Good you're such an avid gamer, like me, now we should stop the offtopic, we are derailing the poor thread.

well, apparently, this article was meant for people like you whom understand the importance of the mouse and keyboard and their precision. The Move can handle stuff like SC, now you just need a keyboard.

Waving one hand in the air as much as SC would require would make it tire insanely fast. You would have to have the move in one hand, and the other on the keyboard. It wouldn't be quite as comfortable as Keyboard and Mouse.

On the other hand. A brand new RTS concept where you control space ships in space battles in a 3D space would be interresting with the move.

Dude, it doesn't matter. The Ps move is going to get its fair share of rap. My point was, it has the eyetoy to compliment the Move, which has similar functionality as Natal, though not as advanced.

Think of it as a bridge between Natal and the Wiimote.

Competition in the industry helps it grow.

you can also play street soccer with the PS move (though the device will probably break fast, the little ball could be then used for ping pong)....