Read the reviews before you blast the score.

From the review:

"If you happen to own both a PS3 and a 360, make sure to snag the PS3 version. Both run well and the content is identical, but the 360 version has a noticeably lower resolution and it's also spread out across three discs. With such a beautiful game that contains some truly remarkable environments (including a crystal forest and some awe-inspiring cities), you'll definitely want the best visual fidelity possible."

The score isn't different because the reviewer didn't thing that a lower resoultion was enough to lower the score, but he does recommend the PS3 version to people who own both consoles. There is no reason to hate on a review because of the score. Hate on a review if you think the reviewer did a poor job reviewing the game and supporting his/her opinions about the game.

Seriously, who cares?

This was supposed to be a PS3 exclusive. 360 owners got FFXIII... they were never supposed to get that, right?

Those cutscenes and loadtime are so bad I can hardly play Final Fantasy 13!!! /sarcasm

I think IGN are great reviewers, unlike others...I'm looking at you Edge.

Well since the current review system is broken i fail to see any bias.

PC gaming does not fit into the equation those games get there own reviews and are completely seperate from the argument. Therefore your chart is bs.

meh, it all depends on the reviewer i guess

In general PS3 first party exclusives ARE much better than everything else out there. Similar to Nintendo's own games being head and shoulder above everyone else. Sony has published more first and second party games than MS which has relied on 3rd parties too much.

balances out the bias against 360 on this site.

lol

yeah don't take that seriously.