By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - Why Ad Blocking is devastating to the sites you love

Max20 said:
DethLord said:

This sounds like an excellent way to drive people such as myself away from this site. Even with an ad blocker there are adverts up and down both sides of the screen. That should be more than enough.

 

Imagine watching a half hour TV show and having 24 minutes of it be commercials. That's what it's like to come here without the ad blocker turned on. I doubt very much you are suffering in any way shape or form from lack of revenue.

 

Kudos on becoming a money grubbing whore Brett.

Should not be happening, you have a bad adblocker or wrongly configured.  By the way lol at your sig, what are you trying to get all the people fed up with this site for various reasons to go over to that site?

I would not wish that on anyone. lol

 

It takes a very "special" kind of person to enjoy that particular website.



Around the Network

This is what I see now. I think this is more than enough advertising.

 



DethLord here. Why ban me?

 

My points were valid. Granted I may have gone a little overboard with my choice of language but sugar coating it does not make it taste any better.

 

Why delete my legitimate posts?

 

Better yet, why leave my original post in someone else quote?

 

I know you'll ban this account too but if this is what this site is coming too I really don't care.



if sites didnt use pop up ads, adult ads or excessive ads i wouldnt use my adblocker
but since most do, thats why i use mine, but i do make exceptions for sites i trust.

also

no offense, but isnt copying and pasting articles hurting sites too?



I dont understand why this is a topic... if you want the sites IP (numbers, news, forum access) then you have to pay since it costs money and time produce. Ads are a convenient way to have a third party pay for these costs.

Blocking ads is a pretty douche-ish behavior as you reap all the benefit an screw over those who provide the content.

Great article Ars...per usual. :)



_____________________________________________________

Check out the VGC Crunch this Podcast and Blog at www.tsnetcast.com

Around the Network

I only block sites that use ads that force the user to click on something so they can read the articles (Hehe my ad is going to cover up what your reading so you HAVE TO look at it to find the close button thats so small you might miss....)

Since this one does not, I wont block your ads.



Ok so I haven't really used an adblocker before, but lately this website has been loading really slowly for me. It is even worse when I have multiple tabs open. I use google chrome btw. I really don't mind the ads that much as I understand why they are needed. The adblock that I am using only blocks a couple of the ads which has greatly increased the speed of the website loading. The gamerprint background and the blur header are still there. It looks like I have only blocked two ads on the homepage and they are the one that is above the numbers chart and then the one to the left of the most popular games. And its not the speed of my internet that is making the site loading slow as I have 4Mb/s and no other website is slow at all. My laptop is about 4 years old and I believe that it is the main problem as it is older. Sorry for the rambling, but these are my observations.




Get your Portable ID!

End of 2009 sales predictions:

PS3 - 33 Million     360 - 40 Million    Wii - 75 Million

nordlead said:
the2bears said:
What's the solution for a) those blocking JavaScript for security reasons, and b) poorly written Flash/JavaScript ads that start using up clock cycles and have huge memory leaks? These are real reasons, never mind how long it takes a site inundated with ads to load. I love how this is painted as "damage" and such. There are very legitimate reasons for running something like NoScript.

Cross-site scripting carried out on websites were roughly 80% of all security vulnerabilities documented by Symantec as of 2007. You can enable noscript to block all XSS while still loading all the regular scripts. This would still load all the content that is intentionally being run on this website without putting your PC at risk. This is what I do, and I see no problem with it.

Blocking all scripts in the name of security is just done by those who aren't aware of what the real security threats are.

Oh, well, since you see no problem with it I guess it must be ok.  Who are you again?  Seriously, I'm taking my advice from someone I know and trust rather than an anonymous internet guy.  Sorry.



the2bears - the indie shmup blog

Here's a decent argument to ars technica and this general idea of ad blockers.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100306/1649198451.shtml



I believe it's been mentioned, but I think it deserves to be repeated. A lot of articles get quoted in their entirety in these forums, along with some "They don't deserve the hits" comment regarding the lack of a link. Other times the link is included, but what's the point with the whole article re-posted? Seems this carries with it at worst copyright issues with some content, but at least at a minimum this breaks the "intent" of the internet: to drive traffic to various content.

You're perfectly within your rights to request users not use adblockers, and within your rights to enforce that policy. But you might clean up your own forums a bit first, before insinuating that others are not good web citizens.



the2bears - the indie shmup blog