axumblade said:
Rainbird said:
axumblade said:
Rainbird said:
axumblade said:
Rainbird said:
I chose that one. It'll obviously be superior, since it uses their motion controls and will also look better than any game on any competing hardware. Seriously, how can you even doubt? |
Too bad you are wrong. The motion controls on the other are superior and offer a lot more accuracy with the movements. And that game is absolutely crap. I think the other one will be a *insert most popular of a certain genre game*-killer.
|
Yeah right, keep living in your fanboy fantasy world. That one will be superior in every way. Just imagine playing it with our motion controls, it's going to be insane!
|
hahaha. Your game doesn't even run at 60 FPS. Of course what more can you expect from a game using an engine that was broken on premise alone. If you look closer at the detail in every aspect of this game, then you'll understand why this game is so much better then your game.
|
Your game should have been on the DS! Not only would the motion controls be better, but your game will obviously sell well the Nintendogs fans!
|
Hah. Lair has a better control system then what your game will have. Also, I can't believe you'd fall for prerendered images as a real trailer of what ingame footage will look like in your game. Even the prerendered images look like something from the PS1 era.
|
Yeah right. Obviously, that there is in game, you can tell because it's close to real life, but not 100%. 60 FPS is something you have to sacrifice for the good graphics! And with motion controls, this will be just like the real thing! My game will have true, 1:1 wanking, so my game is obviously better.
@ Seece
Pffft, we're having a serious discussion here. You won't get banned on VGC for that!
