No there isn't.  Because rich and poor states are decided by median income.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_median_income

So if I start sucking dick, say I hate God and go liberal my IQ will go up?

That's not necessarily true ...

There are elements of liberalism and conservatism that both the poor and the rich may be attracted to. Consider stances on crime as an example, while some wealthier people support tough crime laws because they have more to lose a lot of poor people support them because they’re more directly impacted by crime on a daily basis; while at the same time some wealthier people believe rehabilitation will lower crime long term and some poor people believe that they shouldn’t be unfairly punished for their mistakes.

I can’t think of a single issue where there is a significant disagreement between liberals and conservatives which is so simple that there is a cut-n-dry separation between the rich and poor.

It's a dumb study. PZ meyers (vocal atheist) critisized people for bragging about this study because it's such a flawed study to begin with. A statistically negligible difference on a test that is largely deemed irrelevant today and grossly flawed in and of itself.

And chairman mao, atheists don't hate god, they don't believe that gods exist, and your reasoning is backwards. The implication (though flawed as I stated above) is that if your IQ were higher, you'd be more likely to have that world view.

In the real world I live in, someone making $30, 000 in New York is not living the same way as someone making the same in Georgia or Florida.

I always thought those that worked the hardest for there money, were the ones least likely to allow someone else to chose what to do with it.

Money is effort, but the more educated you are, the less effort it takes to earn it. If you sit in an office all day and think "All I did was think a little, we can take a little more from people who do this and give it to the poor, because how hard is it really?".

While a unskilled (or less skilled) farmer would think "I am living off my own effort, doing something anyone in the world could do. Why take my money and give it to someone who chose not to work as hard as I did today?"

Oversimplification, but I think that line of reason has some marrit.

Exactly. The only differences are motive and implementation.

@ Chairman-Mao

lol you better invest in some lip balm and knee pads.

Again, maybe I should be more clear. Poor people always want more Government involvement into their lives, While Rich People do not.

I am sure PARIS hilton agrees with you.

eh, i know smart people across the board in all of those metrics, though this study does apply to me a bit. Quite intelligent (though i don't think i was ever actually told the score, and i don't think i've been retested since age 6), socially liberal with some authoritarian and utilitarian leanings (i'm pretty much a low-grade Communist), my religion at this point would probably qualify as either Deist or Kantian, which are at least closer to Agnostic than to regular faith, and quite sexually reserved (not a prude by any stretch of the imagination, but i haven't been on so much as a date by age 20)

Though my utilitarianism explains that more than any sense of intellect, unless intellect is linked to utilitarianism.