Garnett said: 3.I agree a .50 cal sniper should not take 2-3 shots to drop someone. |
And I believe that when we die, we should be permabanned from playing Online.
What did you think of the BBC2 Demo? | |||
Loved it. | 35 | 47.95% | |
Hated It. | 7 | 9.59% | |
It was okay. | 23 | 31.51% | |
Too busy with MW2... | 3 | 4.11% | |
Never heard of it. | 5 | 6.85% | |
Total: | 73 |
Garnett said: 3.I agree a .50 cal sniper should not take 2-3 shots to drop someone. |
And I believe that when we die, we should be permabanned from playing Online.
Akvod said:
And I believe that when we die, we should be permabanned from playing Online. |
That really added to the thread.
You must not know what a .50 cal bullet is, let me tell you. (Since your going to google it anyways)
The 5.56 is the round the m16/m4 shoots, the 7.62 is the round the basic sniper shoots and the 12.7 (.50 cal) is the round a barret .50 cal sniper/ Machine gun shoots
The .50 cal was used to destroy tanks in WW1 and early in WW2, Now we use it for Snipers and Machine guns, if a bullet hits someone there gonna get blown in HALF, there not gonna walk after being shot with a .50 cal round.
And why is this in the Sony thread?
Chairman-Mao said:
1. The controls in Modern Warfare are better, admit it 2. I have Killzone 2 and the graphics are great. BC2 graphics looks like a launch title or something similar 3. It takes 2-3 body shots to kill with a sniper EVERY TIME which is totally ridiculous and unrealistic. I'm not saying it should be a one hit kill every time but when its 2 or 3 every time its insane. 4. I dunno maybe I'm bad with RPG but i put them pretty close to people and they didn't die. 5. You didn't say anything about the bad spawn system. I spawned several times with enemies and sometimes if I was lucky an enemy tank right near me ready to kill me. I know MW2 has a shit spawn system too but I would have thought DICE would see how bad MW2 spawns were and they would make a better one for a game coming out 5-6 months later. |
1. I like the Controls. Its just a matter of taste I never had problems with the controls of a FPS.
2. Graphics are not that great but I think that they are ok especially with the great physics you get its not an issue imo. Launch title is exaggerated.
3. when a Sniper kills me its mostly an one hit kill also dont forget that if you shoot over long distances that the bullets are not going straight out because of gravity they fall down so you have to aim a little above where you want to hit depending on distance. If you hit someone just on the edge its ofcourse not deadly.
4. The RPG is very powerful and it is enough if you hit a spot in the right distance to kill someone. I definetly see no problem here.
5 I played the demo atleast 30 hours and not once I spawned with enemies or a tank its just bad luck. Only thing which annoyes me is if you are attackers and you jump down with a parachute it happens that you accidently press X and commit suicide.
I still have to decide which shooter I buy MAG or Battlefield. But probably both sooner or later and then no shooter for a long time. I really think battlefield is the best shooter out there ( I have yet to play MAG properly). I never had any of the problems some mentioned here and I like the fact that your tactics decide how good you are. And I like that the team which attacks with 4 snipers will loose always. One good sniper per team or 2 average ones are enough they take out all the guys behind stationary RPGs and machine guns.
Also I think the vehicles are balanced perfectly they are not too strong and not to weak except the bus with the machine gun it breaks too easily 2 shoots to destroy it would be nice. If MAG is similar good balanced I will buy it first.
In the end all depends on your own taste and everyone has its own taste so some people like the points you dont like and vice versa.
Akvod said:
1. Never played it. If you want to strafe and sprint, be my guest. 2. That was my point, if you only care about graphics, play KZ2. 3. You want to have randomnized damage? Wut? 4. You answered it yourself. It's not maybe, you ARE bad. I'm not saying that's a bad thing, I was bad at FPSs at one point. But I don't blame the genre for my incompetence, but just buckle up and get better at it. 5. If the Attackers managed to spawn camp you, then you're bad defenders in the first place. DICE already posted a comment on this. I'm about to go get Heavy Rain, so ask KylieDog to see it. |
1. I don't even get what you're saying with strafe and sprint. You can't sprint while strafing in MW2
2. I don't only care about graphics, but it is very possible to make a game that is both fun and great graphics. ie Uncharted, Gears of War, Call of Duty, etc.
3. Okay no I don't want randomized damage. I would prefer 1 shot kills with snipers but obviously that's not how they designed the game so whatever, I'll just get used to that if I have to.
4. I'm not bad at FPS. Back when MW2 came out and I was a try-hard my KD ratio was at 3.00 and after a few months of screwing around its still at 2.00. I'm not saying I'm the greatest because I'm clearly not, but I'm probably above average. Anyways all I'm saying is in my experience the RPG was not damaging enough and my friend I was playing with (also a MW2 player) agreed with me.
5. I'm not going to play a game where you can get spawn trapped if your having a bad game or playing with bad people. Simple as that. If they're going to have set spawns they should at least make you invincible for ~10 seconds after you spawn so you can run and hide before getting blown up by the tank whores in the game.
I'll give the demo another try because I haven't played it in a week or 2 but right now I'm not impressed.
Chairman-Mao said:
1. I don't even get what you're saying with strafe and sprint. You can't sprint while strafing in MW2 2. I don't only care about graphics, but it is very possible to make a game that is both fun and great graphics. ie Uncharted, Gears of War, Call of Duty, etc. 3. Okay no I don't want randomized damage. I would prefer 1 shot kills with snipers but obviously that's not how they designed the game so whatever, I'll just get used to that if I have to. 4. I'm not bad at FPS. Back when MW2 came out and I was a try-hard my KD ratio was at 3.00 and after a few months of screwing around its still at 2.00. I'm not saying I'm the greatest because I'm clearly not, but I'm probably above average. Anyways all I'm saying is in my experience the RPG was not damaging enough and my friend I was playing with (also a MW2 player) agreed with me. 5. I'm not going to play a game where you can get spawn trapped if your having a bad game or playing with bad people. Simple as that. If they're going to have set spawns they should at least make you invincible for ~10 seconds after you spawn so you can run and hide before getting blown up by the tank whores in the game.
I'll give the demo another try because I haven't played it in a week or 2 but right now I'm not impressed. |
Well it's over. Too bad for you.
Beta turned into a camp fest, won't be buying, MAG is more than enough.
I don't get how no one complains that is in the Sony forum, but if it was in the Microsoft forum the first post would have been, "Why isn't this in the gaming section?" I have noticed this a few times.
But OT, I like the demo, a few friends of mine are probably going to get it so I should have a squad to play with at all times. The 4v4 should be really fun.
wrong forum. this game is multiplat.
And I did not like the demo
Imagine not having GamePass on your console...
Chairman-Mao said:
1. The controls in Modern Warfare are better, admit it 2. I have Killzone 2 and the graphics are great. BC2 graphics looks like a launch title or something similar 3. It takes 2-3 body shots to kill with a sniper EVERY TIME which is totally ridiculous and unrealistic. I'm not saying it should be a one hit kill every time but when its 2 or 3 every time its insane. 4. I dunno maybe I'm bad with RPG but i put them pretty close to people and they didn't die. 5. You didn't say anything about the bad spawn system. I spawned several times with enemies and sometimes if I was lucky an enemy tank right near me ready to kill me. I know MW2 has a shit spawn system too but I would have thought DICE would see how bad MW2 spawns were and they would make a better one for a game coming out 5-6 months later. |
1. You just got used to the controls in MW. It takes time when you switch over from different shooters that is all.
3. That is odd because sniper shots in B:BC2 are one hit kill depending on where you shoot the person. There is also bullet delay in the game and it could be lag.
4. Unless you hit the target directly or really really close to them, RPG's will not kill. Only the radius from the blast will damage which usually does do a lot of damage and with a pistol you should be able to kill them. But it would be weird if your RPG's don't kill on direct or very close hit.
5. Just like previous BF games, the game has particular areas throughout the maps for spawning which you choose to spawn at and opposing players can camp those areas. The spawn points are not randomized, the spawn areas are however set. That's why you can always spawn near your squad mate or spawn with a parachute.
Akvod said:
Well it's over. Too bad for you. |
Saved me some boredom...