By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Netyaroze on 25 February 2010
Edit Thread
Chairman-Mao said:
Akvod said:
Chairman-Mao said:
It sucked ass crack. I know you can't compare every game to Modern Warfare but since they're both modern war shooters I think you can. The controls were clunkier, the graphics were average, the movement didn't seem as fluid (probably due to it being 20 fps, not 60 fps like MW2). The shooting wasn't great either. The snipers take multiple hits to kill someone, the RPG is non-lethal, several times I spawned with an enemy tank beside me, and there's more problems.

As much as I complain about MW2 it s a much better game then BC2.

Sorry you can't sprint and strafe at the same time.

If you want graphics, play Killzone 2.

Oh noes, I can't get 1 shot body kills, how dare they expect me to get headshots!

The RPG is extremely powerful. The splash is too big IMHO, as I've taken out entire groups of people with it. It's even awesome if I get a tracer on a sniper, and there's 2-3 other snipers right next to him.

 

 

1. The controls in Modern Warfare are better, admit it

2. I have Killzone 2 and the graphics are great. BC2 graphics looks like a launch title or something similar

3. It takes 2-3 body shots to kill with a sniper EVERY TIME which is totally ridiculous and unrealistic. I'm not saying it should be a one hit kill every time but when its 2 or 3 every time its insane.

4. I dunno maybe I'm bad with RPG but i put them pretty close to people and they didn't die.

5. You didn't say anything about the bad spawn system. I spawned several times with enemies and sometimes if I was lucky an enemy tank right near me ready to kill me. I know MW2 has a shit spawn system too but I would have thought DICE would see how bad MW2 spawns were and they would make a better one for a game coming out 5-6 months later.




1. I like the Controls. Its just a matter of taste I never had problems with the controls of a FPS. 

2. Graphics are not that great but I think that they are ok especially with the great physics you get its not an issue imo. Launch title is exaggerated.

3. when a Sniper kills me its mostly an one hit kill also dont forget that if you shoot over long distances that the bullets are not going straight out because of gravity they fall down so you have to aim a little above where you want to hit depending on distance. If you hit someone just on the edge its ofcourse not deadly. 


4. The  RPG is very powerful and it is enough if you hit a spot in the right distance to kill someone. I definetly see no problem here.

5 I played the demo atleast 30 hours and not once I spawned with enemies or a tank its just bad luck. Only thing which annoyes me is if you are attackers and you jump down with a parachute it happens that you accidently press X and commit suicide. 

I still have to decide which shooter I buy MAG or Battlefield. But probably both sooner or later and then no shooter for a long time. I really think battlefield is the best shooter out there ( I have yet to play MAG properly). I never had any of the problems some mentioned here and I like the fact that your tactics decide how good you are. And I like that the team which attacks with 4 snipers will loose always. One good sniper per team or 2 average ones are enough they take out all the guys behind stationary RPGs and machine guns. 
Also I think the vehicles are balanced perfectly they are not too strong and not to weak except the bus with the machine gun it breaks too easily 2 shoots to destroy it would be nice. If MAG is similar good balanced I will buy it first.
In the end all depends on your own taste and everyone has its own taste so some people like the points you dont like and vice versa.