Yes, some of the cutscenes were really awful. And about the glitches... I have beaten the game at least six times at this point, and I've only ever encountered a severe glitch once, where I fell through the city, died, and respawned. 

OT: I would love an inFamous 2, but I'd rather they wait till 2011 and make sure it's the best game possible. Quality over quantity. That said, I can't wait for the game!

Isn't it a bit too early for a sequel? I'd expect at least a 2 year gap.

Confirmed!!! All they need to do is deliver cutscenes better and this game will be amazing.

I doubt Infamous 2 will be out this year, it sounds more like 2011 imo.

though i guess it is possible that it'll be out holiday 2010 -- if Insomniac can do it, then other developers should be just as capable.

Wasn't it PTOM who also said Killzone 3 may come out this year?

If we listen to these mags, every big PlayStation game is getting a sequel this year.

Insomniac also takes two years for each game. They have one team working on one game, another working on the second, and a third team that moves back and forth between the two, depending on which game is closer to being released.

everyone hated the cutscenes? i loved there art direction

The game needs something, though. I'm not knocking the game, I'll be the first to say that inFAMOUS is an incredible game, one of my favorite games of all time actually; but once I beat it for the second time, I enjoyed the gameplay and my powers so much that I just wanted to keep using them. I just wanted to go to town on some more baddies...lots and lots of baddies, as many as and whenEVER I wanted. But there wasn't really much to do. There were only a few spawn points for enemies on each island, and these were few and far between. It really left me wanting more, and I wished so bad it had at least SOME other mode where you could use and practice with your powers. Now granted, I probably spent about 40 hrs on the game once I platinumed it and finished through my second playthrough, so this game was still well worth the $60.

I'm not really a multiplayer guy but I would love to see inFAMOUS get online and coop, as long as it 1)is done right and the proper effort and amount of time is spent to make it a solid experience and 2)wouldn't mean that they took any time away from the single player experience. If these 2 guidelines were followed, I don't think multiplayer/coop could mean ruining the game at all. Just look at Uncharted 2- many ppl were mad that it was getting multiplayer for different reasons, including saying it would ruin the game and it wasn't meant to have multiplayer; but not only did the U2 single player tronce that of U1, but the multiplayer was very solid, fun, and addicting, and added MUCH replay value to the game (it's actually the FIRST game to ever get me hooked on it's multiplayer; tried many before and just never had fun, but I'm hooked on U2 multiplayer like there's no tomorrow). Plus, this is a great way imo to create a larger user base. Some ppl buy games solely for the multiplayer portion of the game, and don't ever even touch the single player; those ppl therefore will not even consider a game like inFAMOUS (1). So if anyone wants a game to sell well, multiplayer can only help this I think...

I'm with you, man. I loved the cutscenes! I loved the delivery of the story in every way, and some cutscenes even got me pumped up bc they were so cool haha. But I think only one person in here gave a negative comment about the cutscenes, don't think everyone said they didn't like them. This was actually the first i ever heard anyone have something negative to say about them, so I think the general concensus on the cutscenes is positive...