famousringo said:
Seece said:
famousringo said:
Seece said:
Demotruk said:
Seece said:
Niiice, completely gloss over what I said and come up with the same rubbish, this isn't a generic xxx motion controller thread, it's specifically PS3 vs 360, the only reason wii fans are in here talking is because you lot can't resist bringing wii into threads were it does'nt belong. I didn't call you a troll I said you were trolling, which imo you are.
|
We're in the thread because it's titled "motion control winner" (Wii) and it's about who will win the motion control war (Wii). Neither Natal nor Arc will 'win' simply by selling more than the other, just like XBox or Gamecube could not win by simply selling more than the other, their main fight is with the dominating player, Nintendo.
|
No it isn't ... go read the OP again.
|
So you disagree with Demotruk's point that because both Sony and Microsoft's new interfaces were introduced as direct responses to the Wii, their success can only be measured against the Wii and not against each other.
What are your reasons for thinking that MS and Sony care to compete against each other? Do you really think that they don't want a piece of the expanded market?
|
My opinion on the matter is irrelievent, I'm talking about what pachter is talking about in the OP, he's talking PS3 vs 360, not Wii vs PS360 .....
and the title is not about the "winner of motion controls" he doesn't even mention "winner" and if it was mentioned it's about who will win between Sony vs Microsoft.
Do we need a token "wii has won the motion controller market" every Natal/Arc sales thread? hmm?
|
I don't think it's your job or my job to decide what we need in a thread. People will discuss what people want to discuss. I think you need to accept that and understand the difference between offering a reasoned opinion and trolling.
This is a web forum, not a business meeting. There is no agenda, and conversation will often move from one subject to another. So even if the OP doesn't mention the Wii, it will be drawn into the conversation because it is the game console which popularized motion control. I'm wondering why you're here in this thread if you feel that your opinions on the matter are irrelevant beyond your insistance that the Wii has no place anywhere in the discussion.
|
Point? Apple is coming up with new, innovative ideas for personal computers....so that means Microsoft should be brought in because they made home computers popular?
There are many different and great MP3/MP4 players on the market right now....talk about iPod/iTouch?
Jackson makes great guitars and is played and enjoyed by many people....so someone should randomly and irrelevantly talk about Fender because Fender jump started American guitar production?
I don't care if the Wii made it popular, or if the Wii is where Sony/Microsoft got their ideas from with motion control. Why should the Wii be talked about in a thread that, despite being titled "Pachter Predicts Motion Control Winner!", it actually refers to and ONLY TO Natal and Arc? To say that the Wii should be talked about in this thread just makes me believe that none of you read the OP.
I have a scenario for you: "Pachter predicts best platformer of 2010" - Michael Pachter has just played compared the platformers for only the 360 and PS3 for 2010 and has said that the 360 will win.
You come in and say "what about Mario?".....even though Pachter was only talking about the PS3 and 360, because if you actually read the OP, you'd realize that