By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - 2K Marin says console wars “silly,” waste creativity

Lyrikalstylez on 07 February 2010

Seriously I hate to admit it but I unfortunatley played a role in this sad thing called system wars

Fortunatley thou I have tried to forget this loyalty nonsense to one console and branched out with different platforms

being open to different consoles only means great things in my opinion



Around the Network
iLLmaticV3 on 07 February 2010

Thanks Mr. Thomas for stating the obvious.

The human mind sure is interesting...



Odd. Future. Wolf. Gang. Kill. Em. All. OFWGKTA Don't give a fuck!

Fuck Steve Harvey. FREE EARL!

Final Fantasy Versus XIII will be the GREATEST game EVER made!!!

I'd take a bullet for Square-Enix! 

 

thekitchensink on 07 February 2010
numonex said:
Supporting a console system is just like supporting a sports team. Sports team fans and console system fans are both religious and are devoted to their side.
We all love a good console fanboy argument. Console wars FTW.

Um... no we don't... I'm a games fanboy, not a console fanboy.  90% of discussion about games is focused on what system they'll be coming out for, rather than anything of actual substance that has to do with the game itself.  It's completely ridiculous, actually.



Could I trouble you for some maple syrup to go with the plate of roffles you just served up?

Tag, courtesy of fkusumot: "Why do most of the PS3 fanboys have avatars that looks totally pissed?"
"Ok, girl's trapped in the elevator, and the power's off.  I swear, if a zombie comes around the next corner..."
Xen on 07 February 2010
numonex said:
Supporting a console system is just like supporting a sports team. Sports team fans and console system fans are both religious and are devoted to their side.
We all love a good console fanboy argument. Console wars FTW.

Fanboy arguments are only good for three things... first come the hits, then come the laughs, and eventually, the bannings rain.



Solid_Snake4RD on 07 February 2010
jesus kung fu magic said:
kingofwale said:
It would make more sense if this wasn't coming from someone whose company first took side in console war and then went Multi.

It's kinda like the maker of Halo calling for video game violence.

"They took sides"? It was a business decision to choose the 360 and it helped them in the long run......they did not "choose sides" like you said.

how did it help them?they could have sold more copies if released on PS3 simultaneously



Around the Network
Xxain on 07 February 2010
Solid_Snake4RD said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
kingofwale said:
It would make more sense if this wasn't coming from someone whose company first took side in console war and then went Multi.

It's kinda like the maker of Halo calling for video game violence.

"They took sides"? It was a business decision to choose the 360 and it helped them in the long run......they did not "choose sides" like you said.

how did it help them?they could have sold more copies if released on PS3 simultaneously


because NEW IP's get more attention when there Xxclusive

Squilliam on 07 February 2010
Xxain said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
kingofwale said:
It would make more sense if this wasn't coming from someone whose company first took side in console war and then went Multi.

It's kinda like the maker of Halo calling for video game violence.

"They took sides"? It was a business decision to choose the 360 and it helped them in the long run......they did not "choose sides" like you said.

how did it help them?they could have sold more copies if released on PS3 simultaneously

because NEW IP's get more attention when there Xxclusive

Also the game development was pretty screwed up and it wouldn't have been something PS3 fans would have even wanted had it been multiplatform. They needed the help they got from Microsoft.



Tease.

Xxain on 07 February 2010
Squilliam said:
Xxain said:
Solid_Snake4RD said:
jesus kung fu magic said:
kingofwale said:
It would make more sense if this wasn't coming from someone whose company first took side in console war and then went Multi.

It's kinda like the maker of Halo calling for video game violence.

"They took sides"? It was a business decision to choose the 360 and it helped them in the long run......they did not "choose sides" like you said.

how did it help them?they could have sold more copies if released on PS3 simultaneously

because NEW IP's get more attention when there Xxclusive

Also the game development was pretty screwed up and it wouldn't have been something PS3 fans would have even wanted had it been multiplatform. They needed the help they got from Microsoft.


yep..ya kno PS3 fans..if it aint Xxclusive, It aint worth it

Squilliam on 07 February 2010
Xxain said:
Squilliam said:

Also the game development was pretty screwed up and it wouldn't have been something PS3 fans would have even wanted had it been multiplatform. They needed the help they got from Microsoft.

yep..ya kno PS3 fans..if it aint Xxclusive, It aint worth it

Nonononono, I mean it wouldn't have been any good/at best average. The recap on Gamasutra explains it all...



Tease.

Solid_Snake4RD on 08 February 2010
Lurker said:
kingofwale said:
It would make more sense if this wasn't coming from someone whose company first took side in console war and then went Multi.

It's kinda like the maker of Halo calling for video game violence.

They never did. Bioshock was a multiplat game on day one.

where the hell have you been.bioshock ps3 released one year later than the 360 version.