By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Final Fantasy XIII 70% Review Score from UK PSM3.

RageBot said:
chenguo4 said:
FFXIII is an example of a genre that refuses to evolve... while people are also bitching about the changes.

Here's the deal. I think it's bullshit they took out towns out of laziness and for "narrative." But realistically speaking, it seems no jrpg can win. If it changes (into anything other than a TPS), people bitch. If it stays the same, guess what, other people bitch.

No one can do jack shit about it. Let's all just stop being retarded and fighting over how good a game is, before it's even come out and most of us have played it.

Refuses to evlove?

Are you for real?

 

I was quoting the dude above me. And I disagree that jrpgs aren't evolving.

My post was simply to say any argument over reviews of a game that hasn't come out is retarded.




PSN: chenguo4
Current playing: No More Heroes

Around the Network
Kasz216 said:
makingmusic476 said:
Who else thinks that's a bit low, and it was judged overly harshly because of the name?

Honestly, a new IP with similar gameplay and graphics would be getting 9s and 10s even if it was linear and the story stank.

Considering FFX-2's metacritic rating... a game getting a LOWER score because of the FF name would be a first.

X-2 could've easily been given the stigma of a FF spin-off, like Crystal Chronicles and other games.

Honestly, based on what I've seen from videos and played from the demo, XIII does not deserve similar scores to Star Ocean 4.



routsounmanman said:
lestatdark said:
routsounmanman said:
lestatdark said:
routsounmanman said:
I don't get why JRPGs get hammered for being "staple" and "need to evolve" or something, yet FPS gets off with that. And MAG scoring over FFXIII? Yeah, right!

Shhh, don't you know that FPS don't need evolution to be fun and that they can all be the same thing, or a downgrade from PC FPS's from the late 90's, early 2000? :P 

JRPG's have to evolve in each game, other wise the genre is dead, doomed, put into a grave, tossed aside and burned at the stake. 

Totally. The double standards with these "professionals" are so profound and annoying, it's getting actually funny.

It has always been like this, but now it's getting even more frustrating, since this feeling is also spreading to gamers themselves. If most of them stopped for a few moments to take a deep to the games they enjoy, they would see that they're pretty much built upon the same pillars that old games from their genre were built as well.

In the future, when current "fan favourite" genres are no longer relevant to the gaming community, we'll see how the fans from those genres will feel when they get the same double standards against them. 

The most annoying of all is this paradox:

Gamers who love JRPGs and have been playing them for a long time, don't really want a big leap or significant changes to their RPGs. People who don't play them / don't really like them, complain about them being "stuck in the past" and "archaic". Oddly, Developers try to expand their franchises to more people, listening to the latter group.

In the end, the latter, still don't get to buy/play/enjoy them, although the developer has altered the formula, whereas the first are alienated by these changes. Thus, the genre keeps bleeding it's own fanbase, while completely falling flat on expanding to an audience who'll never get into the genre after all.

PS: I've quoted you more than 10x anyone else in these forums

FPS have improved about as much as they can from a basic gameplay stand point (you shoot - not much you can do there), meanwhile JRPGs have constantly evolving gameplay, sometimes attempting (and often failing) to make the games more action based, other times providing unique twists on turned based gameplay, and in the case of XIII, providing a nice mix of preset combos and action combat.

FPS could only really improve in the one area I'd like both FPSes and JPRGs to improve: storytelling.  This is also one area in which I'd definitely label JRPGs as being"stuck in the past", simply because JRPGs these days focus more and more and lengthy cutscenes and deep, involved stories, yet the presentation and narrative found in these games have barely progressed past the level of FFX over the past decade.

XIII, however, has improved in this area considerably from what I've seen, and XII made similar advancements over its predecessor.  I'm playing White Knight Chronicles right now, and it has the same cliche moments told in an awkward manner by weak actors that I've been seeing for years.  It's really the biggest weak spot of the game.  Normally I wouldn't mind this in a game, but when the emphasis is on story and they make you watch 20+ minute cutscenes, at least make them worth watching.

Valkyria Chronicles performed quite nicely in this area, though, given its anime-ish influences.  I've heard good things about Tales of Vesperia as well.

I honestly would love to see some sort of anime/rpg cross over in the future.  Have somebody (Namco?) work with an anime studio to make a cel-shaded RPG with great gameplay and a great story told via anime cutscenes.  I believe Level 5 are doing this with Studio Ghibli for their next DS game.



Welcome back MM, and I totally agree with you.



Whats with the 65% for Silent Hill: Shattered Memories (PSP)?



Around the Network
KLucifer said:
let's all blame 360 for this low score???...yeah???...that sounds about right...

ok but for reals....

@chenguo4...

really???...not evolve???...FF series is the one series known to evolve EVERY release or implement something NEW to the jrpg genre...so i guess ff1 ff7 and ff13 all have same gameplay...and hasn't evolved...

there was a HUGE evolution from ff6 to ff7 couple minors in between up to X and then another HUGE evolution in XII...

if it's about not evolving and what not...persona4 should get the trophy for that imo....but persona3 and persona4 was awesome...still pretty much the same game...just some MINOR changes...no big changes like FF series

Just because the game went from 2D to 3D from FFVI to FFVII does not equal "HUGE evolution," although, I do agree that every FF has been very different, the largest change being from X to XII.  The only big changes in gameplay between FFVI and FFVII were the inclusion of mini-games to make the story more interactive.  Still, Final Fantasy is the most inventive of all the jrpgs, and to claim that it is stuck in the past is like saying FPS shooters need to not involve shooting and first-person point of view... too cliche and overused :O



makingmusic476 said:
Kasz216 said:
makingmusic476 said:
Who else thinks that's a bit low, and it was judged overly harshly because of the name?

Honestly, a new IP with similar gameplay and graphics would be getting 9s and 10s even if it was linear and the story stank.

Considering FFX-2's metacritic rating... a game getting a LOWER score because of the FF name would be a first.

X-2 could've easily been given the stigma of a FF spin-off, like Crystal Chronicles and other games.

Honestly, based on what I've seen from videos and played from the demo, XIII does not deserve similar scores to Star Ocean 4.

X-2 scored over a 90... i believe.  Which is... well it's X-2.



Kasz216 said:
makingmusic476 said:
Kasz216 said:
makingmusic476 said:
Who else thinks that's a bit low, and it was judged overly harshly because of the name?

Honestly, a new IP with similar gameplay and graphics would be getting 9s and 10s even if it was linear and the story stank.

Considering FFX-2's metacritic rating... a game getting a LOWER score because of the FF name would be a first.

X-2 could've easily been given the stigma of a FF spin-off, like Crystal Chronicles and other games.

Honestly, based on what I've seen from videos and played from the demo, XIII does not deserve similar scores to Star Ocean 4.

X-2 scored over a 90... i believe.  Which is... well it's X-2.

*slaps self*

For some reason I took from your inital comment that FFX-2 scored abnormally low, which looking back makes little sense.

Hm, well, I guess since Square went from being on top of the world to the lackluster X-2, to the MMO XI, to XII, a game that received heavy fan backlash, to the incredibly hyped XIII, maybe reviewers went in with a more critical eye than most games are accustomed to. S etting the game up to fail, so to speak.

Granted I haven't played the game, but had this come from another publisher and had it been called the Concluding Paragraph or something, I doubt it would've scored a 7 when games like Star Ocean, Infinite Undiscovery, and Eternal Sonata all score around there.



pterodactyl said:

Yeah, I think this game is going to be SE's last venture on the HD twins. It'll get horrible reviews and reception and SE will go back to making games with substance on Nintendo platforms instead of CGI circle-jerks.

You know, that really doesnt make sense and makes you sound like a fanboy.



chenguo4 said:
RageBot said:
chenguo4 said:
FFXIII is an example of a genre that refuses to evolve... while people are also bitching about the changes.

Here's the deal. I think it's bullshit they took out towns out of laziness and for "narrative." But realistically speaking, it seems no jrpg can win. If it changes (into anything other than a TPS), people bitch. If it stays the same, guess what, other people bitch.

No one can do jack shit about it. Let's all just stop being retarded and fighting over how good a game is, before it's even come out and most of us have played it.

Refuses to evlove?

Are you for real?

 

I was quoting the dude above me. And I disagree that jrpgs aren't evolving.

My post was simply to say any argument over reviews of a game that hasn't come out is retarded.

Oh...i'm a silly, silly man :(



Bet with Dr.A.Peter.Nintendo that Super Mario Galaxy 2 won't sell 15 million copies up to six months after it's release, the winner will get Avatar control for a week and signature control for a month.