By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Killzone 2 or Halo 3?

 

Killzone 2 or Halo 3?

Killzone 2 221 54.17%
 
Halo 3 187 45.83%
 
Total:408
Squilliam on 06 February 2010
Netyaroze said:
Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

 

Hmm first I thought it was a mistake but probably I dont understand it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85-89% Metacritic.



Tease.

Around the Network
xxmob on 06 February 2010

kz2 control system is way to wired and hard for someone to pick up and play

halo control system works very well which pretty much makes it a pick up and play game

so i'll go with halo




RockSmith372 on 06 February 2010

halo 3 just because i like arguing



Smeags on 07 February 2010

Halo 3 has 4 player local multiplayer, so I'll go with that.



3DS Rec Thread ~ Wii U Rec Thread ~ Xbox One Rec Thread

gamings_best on 07 February 2010
Squilliam said:
Netyaroze said:
Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

 

Hmm first I thought it was a mistake but probably I dont understand it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85-89% Metacritic.

ok fanboy listen,

1. i did not know fps came out in the 80s,

2 your trying to say killzone was nothing but visuals and that's complete bullshit, the people who played and loved killzone loved the game, multiplayer was one of the best this generation, but only for hardcore gamers, halo was simple, easy, fun right out the box, and the funny thing is halo plays like the classic fps, while killzone is the more modern classs based gameplay, but I'm not saying halo was bad, it was a terrific game that nailed everything it wanted to be, it was super accessible as well, casual audience greatly outweigh the hardcore market

killzone on the other hand wasn't accessible, it was for hardcore gamers, it was a class, tactical shooter that required a lot of time and patience to master, this of course turned off alot of people as they were looking for something much to simple,

80's comment was extremely retarded though, the player hosted dedicated servers, and community intergration prove that much.

but these are 2 totally differnt game for 2 totally different gamers, only reason they are being put up against eachother is the fact that they are exclusive, and in that case I say it's not fair for either game, no one will just enjoy the game, instead just look for ways to bash the other game of the console they don't like, like you are doing, this truly is shaping up to be the worst gaming generation ever, you fanboys are dispicable.

 



Around the Network
iLLmaticV3 on 07 February 2010

72-72, This is like the most intense thread ever! Who will win!?



Odd. Future. Wolf. Gang. Kill. Em. All. OFWGKTA Don't give a fuck!

Fuck Steve Harvey. FREE EARL!

Final Fantasy Versus XIII will be the GREATEST game EVER made!!!

I'd take a bullet for Square-Enix! 

 

xwolf7 on 07 February 2010

Personally I much prefer Killzone 2. it's universe are captivating and fascinating to me, i love the ambientation and the art direction of the game.....

And of course the gameplay is very well done and very well implemented




PSN ID: xwolf7 / NNID: xwolf_07 

  The Wonderful 101 GOTY 2013 - Bayonetta 2 GOTY 2014 - Xenoblade Cross GOTY 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Squilliam on 07 February 2010
gamings_best said:
Squilliam said:
Netyaroze said:
Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

 

Hmm first I thought it was a mistake but probably I dont understand it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85-89% Metacritic.

ok fanboy listen,

1. i did not know fps came out in the 80s,

2 your trying to say killzone was nothing but visuals and that's complete bullshit, the people who played and loved killzone loved the game, multiplayer was one of the best this generation, but only for hardcore gamers, halo was simple, easy, fun right out the box, and the funny thing is halo plays like the classic fps, while killzone is the more modern classs based gameplay, but I'm not saying halo was bad, it was a terrific game that nailed everything it wanted to be, it was super accessible as well, casual audience greatly outweigh the hardcore market

killzone on the other hand wasn't accessible, it was for hardcore gamers, it was a class, tactical shooter that required a lot of time and patience to master, this of course turned off alot of people as they were looking for something much to simple,

80's comment was extremely retarded though, the player hosted dedicated servers, and community intergration prove that much.

but these are 2 totally differnt game for 2 totally different gamers, only reason they are being put up against eachother is the fact that they are exclusive, and in that case I say it's not fair for either game, no one will just enjoy the game, instead just look for ways to bash the other game of the console they don't like, like you are doing, this truly is shaping up to be the worst gaming generation ever, you fanboys are dispicable.

 

1. Wolf3D is generally considered to be about the first FPS game. It came out in 1991 IIRC.

2. Bumping a couple of points off for higher than average graphics doesn't mean I said that the game sucked. Thats all I have to say to you since you're slinging the naughty words around. If I wasn't in a good mood I would report you.



Tease.

SOLDIER_Cloud on 07 February 2010

I enjoy killzone 2 more because of its online and gameplay.



gamings_best on 07 February 2010
Squilliam said:
gamings_best said:
Squilliam said:
Netyaroze said:
Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

 

Hmm first I thought it was a mistake but probably I dont understand it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85-89% Metacritic.

ok fanboy listen,

1. i did not know fps came out in the 80s,

2 your trying to say killzone was nothing but visuals and that's complete bullshit, the people who played and loved killzone loved the game, multiplayer was one of the best this generation, but only for hardcore gamers, halo was simple, easy, fun right out the box, and the funny thing is halo plays like the classic fps, while killzone is the more modern classs based gameplay, but I'm not saying halo was bad, it was a terrific game that nailed everything it wanted to be, it was super accessible as well, casual audience greatly outweigh the hardcore market

killzone on the other hand wasn't accessible, it was for hardcore gamers, it was a class, tactical shooter that required a lot of time and patience to master, this of course turned off alot of people as they were looking for something much to simple,

80's comment was extremely retarded though, the player hosted dedicated servers, and community intergration prove that much.

but these are 2 totally differnt game for 2 totally different gamers, only reason they are being put up against eachother is the fact that they are exclusive, and in that case I say it's not fair for either game, no one will just enjoy the game, instead just look for ways to bash the other game of the console they don't like, like you are doing, this truly is shaping up to be the worst gaming generation ever, you fanboys are dispicable.

 

1. Wolf3D is generally considered to be about the first FPS game. It came out in 1991 IIRC.

2. Bumping a couple of points off for higher than average graphics doesn't mean I said that the game sucked. Thats all I have to say to you since you're slinging the naughty words around. If I wasn't in a good mood I would report you.

ohhhh so killzone is wolf3d then...................................... right that wasn't a retarded comment?

note: I'm not calling you retarded, just the statment you made,

and what's with the bash on resistance? both quality shooter for their time no? oh right ps3 exclusive..........