Killzone 2 or Halo 3?

[gamings_best]

Squilliam said:

Netyaroze said:

Squilliam said:

They were both over-inflated due to hype anyway except Halo 3 never had as good graphics compared to the competition at the time whilst Killzone 2 got a lot of 10/10 graphics scores. So take away the graphics inflation and you have another Resistance Fall of Man 1/2 type game. A late 80s shooter along the same vein as Call of Duty 5. 

 

Hmm first I thought it was a mistake but probably I dont understand it.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

85-89% Metacritic.

ok fanboy listen,

1. i did not know fps came out in the 80s,

2 your trying to say killzone was nothing but visuals and that's complete bullshit, the people who played and loved killzone loved the game, multiplayer was one of the best this generation, but only for hardcore gamers, halo was simple, easy, fun right out the box, and the funny thing is halo plays like the classic fps, while killzone is the more modern classs based gameplay, but I'm not saying halo was bad, it was a terrific game that nailed everything it wanted to be, it was super accessible as well, casual audience greatly outweigh the hardcore market

killzone on the other hand wasn't accessible, it was for hardcore gamers, it was a class, tactical shooter that required a lot of time and patience to master, this of course turned off alot of people as they were looking for something much to simple,

80's comment was extremely retarded though, the player hosted dedicated servers, and community intergration prove that much.

but these are 2 totally differnt game for 2 totally different gamers, only reason they are being put up against eachother is the fact that they are exclusive, and in that case I say it's not fair for either game, no one will just enjoy the game, instead just look for ways to bash the other game of the console they don't like, like you are doing, this truly is shaping up to be the worst gaming generation ever, you fanboys are dispicable.