By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - BIG RUMOR: Ubisoft involved with Nintendo's new platform?

Not ubisoft!! please!!



MY ZELDA COLLECTION
Around the Network

Why would Nintendo need ubisoft's help for anything? Nintendo knows how to develop software to push their own console. Square Enix or Namco would be better. But this is just another Internet rumor stated by some blogger. Now it's working it's magic.



If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba

 

This is a joke.



@patjuan: Yeah, the post the guy made may have been misread, and it may not actually mean Ubisoft has something to do with Nintendo's supposedly new system, but this comes from no blog, this comes from a forum and the text you read in the OP was written by an official employee from Ubisoft themselves, and later got backed up by a THQ employee. Sometimes the internet doesn't lie :O



Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.

tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."

Bets with Conegamer:

Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.

Fullfilled Prophecies

trestres said:
@patjuan: Yeah, the post the guy made may have been misread, and it may not actually mean Ubisoft has something to do with Nintendo's supposedly new system, but this comes from no blog, this comes from a forum and the text you read in the OP was written by an official employee from Ubisoft themselves, and later got backed up by a THQ employee. Sometimes the internet doesn't lie :O

99% of the time it does. No one's opinion is valed unless it comes from the company themselves. How is an employee of Ubisoft or THQ crediable? Heck, do we even know if they are from Ubisoft or THQ. They could very well be imposters. This is why I said to question Nintendo first.



Around the Network

They are not impostors, of course you would know if you cared to read the OP on its entirety. They were invited by the forum to answer a bunch of questions about upcoming games (in Ubisoft case) and then simply asked a question in regards to their 2010 plans (THQ's case)

Some of you are trying too hard to make it seem this is a big conspiracy against the Wii.



Proud poster of the 10000th reply at the Official Smash Bros Update Thread.

tag - "I wouldn't trust gamespot, even if it was a live comparison."

Bets with Conegamer:

Pandora's Tower will have an opening week of less than 37k in Japan. (Won!)
Pandora's Tower will sell less than 100k lifetime in Japan.
Stakes: 1 week of avatar control for each one.

Fullfilled Prophecies

Some fear that Ubisoft will ruin Nintendo's amazing 2010 with their infamous shovelware titles.

( Expect Hybridz ).



 

                      "The Common Cold Isn't So Common During The Cold"     

Well isnt it true that the Nintendo Nvidia or IBM manufacturing hardware parts expires 2011 for WII? Correct me If im wrong. So in other words Nintendo has to decide whether to continue to contract for what 3-4 more years? or just end with with a release of a new console?....

 

If it holds true, then this would attract developers such as Capcom and Square and third party developers to release titles that were not developed for the Wii....and have it sent to the Wii2.....or Wiitoo.

 



Whatever is going on, please make quality (a) game(s) Ubisoft.



maybe a Nintendo Tablet!