By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - RUMOR: Sonic PLAYABLE in Super Mario Galaxy 2 (From NGamer's Tweet)!!

arsenicazure on 05 February 2010

That would be slightly weird. What next: mario and sonic: unleashed!?

Both of them have extremely opposite characteristics...



Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.

owner of : atari 2600, commodore 64, NES,gameboy,atari lynx, genesis, saturn,neogeo,DC,PS2,GC,X360, Wii

5 THINGS I'd like to see before i knock out:

a. a AAA 3D sonic title

b. a nintendo developed game that has a "M rating"

c. redesgined PS controller

d. SEGA back in the console business

e. M$ out of the OS business

Around the Network
Mr Khan on 05 February 2010

No possible way would Nintendo agree to that. Not in 100,000 years.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

*Sound Of Rain on 05 February 2010

Sega wants to ruin Mario Galaxy 2 with Sonic? Cool! Bye bye millions of copies.



Demotruk on 05 February 2010

What a dumb rumor. This was just done to set off the internet.



A game I'm developing with some friends:

www.xnagg.com/zombieasteroids/publish.htm

It is largely a technical exercise but feedback is appreciated.

Smashchu2 on 05 February 2010

Not sure why they'd put Sonic in a main Mario title.



Around the Network
ECC on 05 February 2010

Mario Galaxy is my favorite game of all time so please Nintendo dont ruin galaxy 2 by adding sonic!

this better be false



 

   
patjuan32 on 05 February 2010
rudyrsr8 said:
I would personally not like that to happen.

I second this statement.



If Nintendo is successful at the moment, it’s because they are good, and I cannot blame them for that. What we should do is try to be just as good.----Laurent Benadiba

 

xavi707 on 05 February 2010

It really really won't happen. . . I hope



Nintendo Network: xavi707

PSN: xavi0707

mike_intellivision on 05 February 2010

The first thought I maybe Nintendo is getting ready to buy some Sega assets.

My second thought is that this might be a swap to get Sega more on board with Nintendo projects (remember for the longest time it appears that Sonic 4/Project Neddlemouse would not be coming to the Wii).

My third thought was that if it were to happen, why would it be bad?

Mike from Morgantown



      


I am Mario.


I like to jump around, and would lead a fairly serene and aimless existence if it weren't for my friends always getting into trouble. I love to help out, even when it puts me at risk. I seem to make friends with people who just can't stay out of trouble.

Wii Friend Code: 1624 6601 1126 1492

NNID: Mike_INTV
Gamerace on 05 February 2010

I just don't see why Nintendo would. There's simply no gain for them. It wouldn't make SMG2 sell significantly more, maybe 500k, maybe, M&S combos are getting old hat. Why bother with the legalities or revenue sharing?

The only way I could see this is if in exchange for Sonic in SSBB, they licensed Mario for M&SatOG and now in exchange for Mario in M&SatWOG Nintendo has the right to use Sonic again but nothing better to use him in. I don't think we'd want Sonic in Zelda or Metroid. Kirby.... maybe.... Really, Mario is worth 10x's what Sonic is and this really only helps Sega any way you slice it.