You could tell gamespot is actually reviewing this game from a professional standpoint while ign on a personal basis. (The guy from ign sounds really frustrated from getting owned)

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/mag/video/6249275/mag-video-review?hd=1 

http://ps3.ign.com/dor/objects/811710/socom-4/videos/mag_vdr_012910.html 

what do you guys think? prefer one review over the other anyone?

one knocked it for not being noob friendly, and one just stated it's not noob friendly........ I perfer the latter

This means nothing!
Wait for the review from that Spanish website on metacritic. They are the only trustworthy reviewers ;)

its not noob friendly at all its nearly impossible to win a match if ur attacking

Meh, IGN rules !!

I thought PS3 fans used to despise Gamespot and love IGN?

Euphoria14 said: I thought PS3 fans used to despise Gamespot and love IGN?

That was when they gave R&C:TOD a 7.5 & IGN gave it over a 9.

There was huge gamespot hate back then.

I agree.. IGN also got a their info wrong sometimes and seem to downgrade the game on faulty issues. Like that final screen "- dosent feel epic" or whatever. I mean c'mon.

You can't spell ignorant w/o IGN. They don't even know how to count. IGN has always been the biggest PS3 haters, so no surprise there.