If you don't like the 360, just get out of this thread, damn sony trolls.

I am getting FF13, Fable 3, and maybe Iron Man 2.

As long as neither Fable 3 or Halo Reach is delayed. If either is delayed to 2011, then in my books 360 doesnt own 2010.

lol

Clearly you're clueless on what's going on in this thread.

I am pretty excited for 2010 and my xbox360. Fable 3 and Splinter cell are my two most wanted games. Last year the PS3 had a better year and I almost bought one at Christmas. Luckily 2010 looks to be a strong 360 gaming year.

Other than Halo Reach and Fable 3 the 360 doesn't have many exclusives whatsoever. With DX11 out and so many PS3 exclusives this year, I can't see it being the year of the 360 at all. Dated tech is really showing it's limitations and this is being reflected in gameplay. Plus, Arc's due in Fall, whereas Natal just seems to be the eyetoy. With the week on week sales of PS3 beating the 360, I can't see 2010 being a good year for 360 - I'd actually be willing to bet it's going to be it's worst.

Well my opinion differes greatly.

You have Reach, Alan Wake, Fable 3, Splinter Cell, Mass Effect 2, KUF2 to name a few games which are only available on 1 console. Also the 360 has the ability to use certain features of DX11. If by limitations you mean the amazing footage of Mass Effect 2 that beats anything last year then yeah 360 is limited. Seeing that game in motion is something else. It has such good animation and amazing texture work. Also it's lighting is phenominal. 360 is in no way at it's limit. Several games as they have approached finishing stages have impressed technically. Splinter Cell's latest screens look awesome as does Alan Wake's actual game footage.

As for Natal, I believe that will sell by the bucket load. I may be wrong, but that will severely boost 360's weekly sales. 2010 is 360's most important and best year yet.

If you want to analyse a consoles performance, you have to look at the entire market e.g. PC.

Alan Wake, Splinter Cell, Mass Effect 2 & KUF 2 are on PC, and therefore aren't going to be a)technically outstanding as they are ports and b)most likely not going to boost, or significantly boost, 360 sales due to being on PC. The main thing with DX11 s tessellation which looks like it's going to help shape next-gen graphics unobtainable on either console. Plus, pre-rendered footage means nothing in terms of graphics. Devs have admitted to reaching the limit of the 360's CPU, which will then bottleneck graphics, whilst DVD causes lower res textures to be used as less DVDs is cheaper for the publishers and therefore better to use.

You forget to say why Natal will boost sales. It's just an eyetoy. Got to remeber the 360 had dated tech in it when it was made, and it can't keep on churning out market-winning titles because of that technical limit.

Sorry to disagree with you again. But a game being on PC wont hinder someones choice in buying a 360 over PS3. A very small hardcore minority who own UBER Pc's built for gaming wont care, but predominantly most average gamers will not use a PC for games like these. Outside of MMO's and strategy games PC gamers dont really bother. Gears OF War PC sales as well as Halo3's and even Mass Effect 1 say that those games sell and are home to 360. M$ have provided lots of support on these games. In effect they have been treated 2nd partyish. I dont believe another developer could have done any better technically.

Mass Effect 2 IMO will be the top graphics on any console when it's released. It's so good.

360 Dated Tech keep killing the Ps3 on MP Tittles :D

Natal will Boost Sales for sure and ALOT , Alan Wake is NOT ON PC stop saying it is droids...