Well you are in the Obama club I'm assuming. Of course your opinion is sewed just like Romney's but in all fairness that last debate was really close and boring; no winner.

The first one, definitely. Second and third largely salvaged that.

Edit: worth noting that, as Kasz once said, the poll bump in Romney's favor likely would have happened anyway as more undecideds commit, because things aren't great and Obama is the incumbent.

I personally dislike both as they are both bought and paid for by the same banking elite and will eventually bankrupt the U.S regardless but I do have to say that in a sense the Romney comment is right. He was trailing significantly in the polls compared to Obama and look how much traction he has gained after the debates and I believe the election will be alot closer than the liberal media is leading us to believe.

P.S A Romney loss would be good because that means" Rand Paul 2016!"

Yep, it probably just pulled most of it foward a bit.

http://www.pollingreport.com/incumbent.htm

I mean... it kinda makes sense. 

http://www.socastee.com/politics/understand_undecided.html

To be fair, the first debate did give us the whole intersting Buzz Bissinger affair though.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/08/buzz-bissinger-why-i-m-voting-for-mitt-romney.html

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10/11/buzz-bissinger-on-being-savaged-by-the-liberal-media-after-backing-mitt-romney.html

The first debate was a "small win"? Did you watch the same debate?

Hah, didn't catch that part...

As I recall I think Romney's win in the first one actually considered the biggest win in recent debate history that didn't have a career ending knockout punch that other debates had.

Romney did fine, but take away the bluster and tough guy act, he really hasn't told us anything. Obama was fine too, he matched Romney almost lie for lie. But I must say, Romney creeps me out, I have a hard time looking at him when he talks, and he's mormon, which I find to be one of the more idiotic religions, oh and the fact that he named his son Tagg, that in itself makes me question some hidden polygamist agenda. I vote Obama by default, though he seems kinda over it and probably wouldn't mind Romney winning, allowing him to go home and watch his kids grow up.

Gary Johnson would be miles ahead of Obama and Romney and honestly not voting for him is a mistake. Were sold the B.S idea that voting for a third party is throwing away your vote when in fact, not voting third party and supporting the lesser of two evils is why our world is in the sad state that it has reached .
This is also why I shake my head at all the idiots on the Republican side who could have voted for Ron Paul and didn't because the media successfully shoved the idea down there throats that he could not win. (Watching the presidential debates, we damn well know that if Romeny faired well against Obama, then Paul would have destroyed him)

Would you really expect Romney to say anything else? Even if he had lost all three debates decisively, he still would have claimed victory. That's pretty much how spin goes in politics.

The real thing to look at is the polls. While some still are using the flawed model of a '08 or better turnout for Obama, they are all showing gains for Romney. It seems that the Obama campaign is starting to panic, since nothing they have done has slowed Romney's gains from the first debate. They're throwing everything and anything against the wall to see what will stick. As the President once said, "If you don't have a record to run on... you make a big election about small things." Big Bird and Binders say hello.