By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

jjseth said:

...

To me and many others the 20gb was not an option. We didn't want the stripped down version of the PS3, we wanted the fully loaded version of the PS3. Obviously the 20gb didn't do well or they wouldn't have discontinued it shortly after release. Even if Sony still had the 20gb in production and it could be bought, it still would not have been an option for me. Why would I get a ham sandwich that only had bread and ham on it, when I could get a ham with cheese lettuce mayo, etc on it? (Just bringing that in the conversation because nobody on this site has made a comparison of ham sammiches to the PS3)

What is deceptive of the 60 gb model having a price cut? Did the price on the 60GB version not get a price cut?

 

Why do you want a PS3?

If I got it - it would be to play games. And the 20Gig model plays all the games, just as well as the other models. Hard disks are upgradable. What else is missing again?

The only reason Sony is not selling the 20Gig model - is lack of profit. Its exactly the same strategy they are showing with the price cut. Not selling anything for a lower price - but giving you "more" (perceived value) for the same price.

Good luck to 'em. 

 



Gesta Non Verba

Nocturnal is helping companies get cheaper game ratings in Australia:

Game Assessment website

Wii code: 2263 4706 2910 1099