| Impulsivity said: It's quite simple the point he's making. The PS3 is a multifaceted machine that plays blu rays/dvds, works a a network hub for any video or music you want on your TV, in some markets works as a DVR now, can run a full fledged OS (Linux is really easy to install), can use 3rd party items really easily (UPnP devices for content, 3rd party hard drives for 320GB PS3s, a ton of blue tooth devices ect.). On top of that it plays high end cutting edge games that rival the best in the high end PC world.
And for all you Nintendomination advocates, in dollars of gaming devices sold Nintendo and Sony are basicly equal given that millions were willing to pay twice as much for a PS3 because they realized the PS3 is more then twice the value of the Wii (in terms of feature set, capabilities and hardware I would peg it at around 3 times the Wii). Price isn't the same as value, value is the relation between what you pay and what you get. The Camary is a better value then the Yaris even though the Yaris costs a lot less because the Yaris is feature poor and clunky even if it still runs. |
You've never taken an economics course, have you?
The front page of this web site is incontrovertable proof that the Wii is considered to be better value per dollar than the PS3. I know, you're shocked and alarmed that not everybody shares your values. It's clearly proof that the world is filled with inferior sheep. If only you could bring true understanding to them. But, alas, they are lost to Mario Kart, and deaf to your wisdom. Woe be unto the foolish flock.

"The worst part about these reviews is they are [subjective]--and their scores often depend on how drunk you got the media at a Street Fighter event." — Mona Hamilton, Capcom Senior VP of Marketing
*Image indefinitely borrowed from BrainBoxLtd without his consent.







