Ahh... I'm going to word this as not to get banned.
Granted to OP seems dim he didn't stray from points that can't currently be proven. Instead he's atacked by the juxtaposition of a few commentators above. Note that commentators are above the other audience and express this through just being a commentator.
However in all this reaction to the OP very few whole arguements are based on anything but feeling and speculation - not even using any form of data to support their antithesis. Not a single quote of any Nintendo rep that matches a Sony rep in context to express their points, instead I read these posts and see I'll just have to take the posters word for it. (Not even a mention of the source, then it could be googled at least.)
The OP stated what has happened - the closest thing to infference was him stating that the competition is low, by his definition of "low" being the point lost in translation, unless he's reffering to the Wii not targeting the PS3 core market then sure.
Instead he's labeled a fanboy for pointing out nothing that isn't true. There's something else wrong with the OP aside from how it was written and he wasn't called names for that?
I'm Unamerica and you can too.
The Official Huge Monster Hunter Thread:
