| Pete_Beast said: DX10 actually does look better than DX9, they should of ust sued this image: P.S. They should add a DX10 update for Windows XP... |
Sorry, but that pic is also bullcrap. That second screen obviously has some more layers in it, aka, more programming and graphics made specifically to render with dX10, or either they were artificially added to take advantage of dX10(edit: or as that guy said earlier, they just paid a graphic artist to touch up the picture as a "target render" which is even worse). I want to see an actual screenshot of the same picture side by side with both running, not an enhanced version that takes advantage of dX10.
Like show me Halo 1 on dX9, then show it on dX10, and show me the difference. Or even something like Assassin's Creed or Crysis, if those games will even run on dX9(which they certainly could, but MS might not license the games anymore if they don't artificially require dX10, that's how they do business).
I'm sorry, but that pic you posted is just as much to fool "n00bs" as the example Microsoft used. It's just slightly harder to understand the con.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
