By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheBigFatJ said:
DTG said:
TheBigFatJ said:
obieslut said:
better upcoming games. more for your money the expensive looking sexy black slick design

 

yes, it looks like a George Foreman Grill, which everyone wants.

You were joking, right? The PS3 has a very ugly design. It looks like 1982.

I think the PS3 is outselling the 360 this year primarily due to Microsoft missteps and the weakness of games on the 360 so far this year.

The Ps3 is extremely slick and shiney. Slick and shiney is hot right now.

 

 

Yes, it has a piano black finish.  But it's huge and ugly and really fat.  Technology is supposed to be small and sexy, but huge, fat and ugly like the PS3 is.  The problem is that Sony engineering couldn't make it small and sexy.  They weren't capable of it. That's literally the truth why it is huge and ugly -- no one in their right mind would have said, "hey, we can make this thing small and sexy but let's make it huge and ugly."

It's more unattractive than the 360.

It looks great standing up, period.  Sony engineers, far better than MS's or anyone MS hires, have built a cool (doesn't fry itself), quiet machine.  MS couldn't have done better, and in fact, they've done worse.  Their shit doesn't even work, with a failure rate at least sixteen times higher than PS3.

How you gonna fit the big, quiet PS3 fan in a smaller, non-convex package, genius?  YOU HAVE TO MAKE A CONSOLE THAT WORKS.  Sony succeeded; aesthetics are constrained by quality concerns.  PS3 still looks more attractive than 360; MS pwned. 

When the Cell and RSX go to smaller die sizes, the package will shrink.  Again, MS couldn't do better and would in fact do worse. 

Your post is pathetic.  Seriously, pathetic trolling.