By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
No_Name_Needed 12 hours ago
Edit Thread
JWeinCom said:
No_Name_Needed said:

Last time I checked "If reports are to believed" means I am saying it may be a rumor or not true. I can bring it up in a discussion as long I don't claim it to be fact, which I never did. Or did I? I chose to use the words "If reports are to believed" for that reason. This isn't a court of law, I not committing perjury by bring it up in an online discussion about wrestling of all things.

The act of continuing to counter book a show that is now a tribute show is vile and classless to ME. I can express that I don't like the act of airing a showing opposite a tribute show and that I feel it is vile and classless (even if no one was hurt) especially if there was a possibility of being able to move said show. It was a YouTube show, it very likely could have been moved.  Again, it is my opinion. I don't think there was anything weird about that opinion, but if you feel otherwise so be it, that is your opinion.

An opinion is not a statement of fact, yet you seem determined to prove me wrong on something when I have done nothing but state my opinions and mentioning something I read online (that I never said was true).

I dunno what's up with the defensiveness. Nobody is stopping you from expressing your opinion. Feels like you just realized you don't have a good reason for your opinion, so you're playing the victim instead of trying to give a rational explanation.

I mean this with 100% sincerity and 0% malice. Is this conversation something you want to spend your free time on? If so, cool. If not, then do something you'd find more value in. Maybe watch some of Pac's best matchups or something. But, if you do choose to keep engaging don't complain about it. This isn't a hostage situation, you are free to leave at any time. 

Yeah, you can bring up whatever you want. And I can ask why you would bring up something you did not believe to be at all valid. What does that add to the conversation? That is a very strange thing to do.

Your opinion is that it was vile and classless. My opinion is that if something does not have any negative impact, it is not in any way morally wrong to do it. And it's weird to be bothered by someone doing something that hurts nobody. 

So, you can either explain why doing something that we agree causes no harm is so morally objectionable to you or you can not. Really up to you man. 

Sir, first I'm not being defensive nor am I playing the victim. I gave you my reason multiple times, I did not agree with countering booking a tribute show, I felt it was in bad taste. Simple as that.

Secondly, you are also no obligated to continue responding to me either. Don't you have something better to do as well. No one is forcing you to respond to me, other than you clearly wanting to have the last word. You can go practice being a lawyer in your local community if you wish, that might be a better use of your time.

Lastly, I already acknowledged that you have the right to your opinion that my opinion is weird (I don't agree, but it is your opinion and I respect it). I said that much in the last post. At this point you are the one that seems worked up about all this, certainly not me. If you ever see one of my comments and they work you up again, just ignore them. Or not, its up to you counselor.