JWeinCom said:
No_Name_Needed said:
Where in my post did I ever say anyone was hurt by this decision. I said I felt it was classless and vile to air at the same time as tribute show, and I (key being I) still stand by that. It is my opinion and last time I checked I have the right to it.
The World Collides show air time was announced before Pac died and like I said I shrugged it off as more counter booking by WWE. However after Pac died I (again I as in my opinion) felt out of respect (which I mentioned in my last post) the least they could do was move it. I never mentioned the move benefiting anyone as well, so why even bring something like that up. Although from an optics stand point it would at least make the WWE look good to move it.
And I never said the reports were true, that is why I said "if reports are to be believed," meaning I don't know if they are true or not regardless of who wrote them. If you don't like or believe Meltzer, that is your problem not mine. Again, I made a point to say "if reports are to be believed" for a reason. Learn to read.
I know this is a forum for discussions, but if you don't like my comments or opinions, don't respond. My comments were opinions nothing more, I never claimed anyone was hurt by the decision to air opposite the tribute, only that it bothered me personally as it was a tribute to a wrestler that worked in WWE in the past. I expressed my issue with the situation, MY ISSUE. If you can't see my issue with it, so be it.
You seem to love to argue and prove people wrong, but my comments were opinions, my personal feelings and not statements of facts. Like I said I never claimed the reports of people within WWE feeling it should be moved were true. But if they were, then in my opinion that would be a good reason to move the World Collide start time, among other reasons.
|
Ok. If you are not saying the reports have validity then why bring them up @_@...
You have the right to your opinion. But your opinion is that while what WWE did something that did not harm anyone in any way it was still vile and classless. I am free to say that's really weird dude.
I do in fact enjoy aruing and proving people wrong. Literally made a career out of it. Don't see the problem if I'm doing so in a respectful manner, which I think I've done. But whether or not to engage further is totally on you. I'm not going to track you down and demand you explain yourserlf, but if you reply to me, I may reply back.
|
Last time I checked "If reports are to believed" means I am saying it may be a rumor or not true. I can bring it up in a discussion as long I don't claim it to be fact, which I never did. Or did I? I chose to use the words "If reports are to believed" for that reason. This isn't a court of law, I'm not committing perjury by bringing it up in an online discussion about wrestling of all things.
The act of continuing to counter book a show that is now a tribute show is vile and classless to ME. I can express that I don't like the act of airing a showing opposite a tribute show and that I feel it is vile and classless (even if no one was hurt) especially if there was a possibility of being able to move said show. It was a YouTube show, it very likely could have been moved. Again, it is my opinion. I don't think there was anything weird about that opinion, but if you feel otherwise so be it, that is your opinion.
An opinion is not a statement of fact, yet you seem determined to prove me wrong on something when I have done nothing but state my opinions and mentioning something I read online (that I never said was true).
Last edited by No_Name_Needed - 19 hours ago
