Jimbo1337 said:
You are conflating two entirely different steps: the administrative process of obtaining an ID versus the operational speed of verifying it at the ballot box. My argument is strictly about the latter. The current voting process heavily relies on manual tasks, where poll workers must slowly cross-reference paper rosters or manually type names into electronic books. My proposed system replaces this human-dependent bottleneck with automated technology. By instantly scanning an ID and flashing a confirmation light in seconds, this process eliminates human error and long lines at the check-in desk. It demonstrates that we can achieve efficient verification without adding any physical burden or inconvenience to the citizen's actual voting experience. |
Ok then let's focus just on what you said. You want to have a photo id scanner at the voting station. Now these 400 people were mistakenly put in the voter roll upon getting their driver's license. So they had an ID that the system you are advocating for would have happily accepted. Your solution has no relation to the issue being cited.
https://www.factcheck.org/2026/08/trump-overstates-magnitude-of-noncitizen-voting-in-new-jersey/
...









