EricHiggin said:
That's true, but if you don't take those 400 seriously because they're 'small' internal problems right now, then you're just asking for that problem to get worse as time goes on, and how large does the number have to get before it's a serious enough threat to crack down on? All you need is for the numbers to get high enough, along with just the right candidate, or better put, wrong candidate to win, just once, and that could be utterly devastating to the point of game over. The point is if you know you have stage 1 cancer, you don't wait until it reaches stage 4 before doing something about it. Unless you want everything that would come along with that... |
All I'm saying is that comparing those 26 to those 400 probably ain't right. I think someone else already touched upon those 400 votes in more detail, and I have no wish to get deeper into this discussion, because participating in it in a meaningful way (including whatever research is needed to be able to do so) is most likely not good use of my time.
