AI Regulation

[shavenferret]

CaptainExplosion said:

shavenferret said:

You are mixing moral reasons (like military and police work) with aesthetic reasons (art, literature, film) for not wanting AI anywhere. When AI is done to write a story for example, it becomes stale and without any taste whatsoever. The same thing happens with film. So, there really isn't a problem there.

Try telling that to artists, actors, writers and animators who dedicated their lives to their crafts, only to have it invaded by computerized plagiarism. AI can't make art on it's own unless it learns from pre-existing works. Disney and Pixar works are frequent victims of gen AI making slop of their work.

These turtles look familiar?

Then there's the audacity of Hasbro to try to get child actors from Peppa Pig to sign their voices over to be used for AI. It's a scam to make sure they never have to hire new voice actors for child characters on the show. It's cheap, lazy and soulless to cheat future actors out of their careers. The fact that Hasbro CEO Chris Cocks makes millions while laying off over 1000 Hasbro employees makes the Peppa Pig situation look even sleazier.

My point was that AI art becomes recognizable.  These characters are interacting nonverbally, and that would be difficult for AI to imitate.  Therefore it can't hold up to real people in many respects.  

The background might be AI.