Norion said:
The thing I posted earlier shows this isn't the case. It used reasoning to disprove something mathematicians believed for close to a century and produced an original idea that has advanced the field of mathematics which is a huge deal. I really think you're not up to date on just how capable state of the art 2026 models are. There's a significant gap between them and the best stuff from a year ago and a big gap between them and the free stuff. They're absolutely capable of producing original ideas now so the idea they just remix and regurgitate their training idea is outdated. |
Finding patterns and drawing conclusions in numerical data isn't forming an original idea, it's data in, data out. There's no "reasoning" involved, the model isn't really thinking.








