Currently Online 
| SanAndreasX said: The Virginia Supreme Court voided the redistricting vote. |
"The irony of this ruling is that
1. if you act democratically and ask the voters, you are punished but if you act like an authoritarian and just do it, it's fine.
2. States are independent so their laws are sacrosanct, but a president can call states and order them to change their maps and that is not election interference. If they refuse,(Indiana) the president can punish the state lawmakers that refused, and that's not election interference either.
3. Governors can violate their constitution(Florida), change the maps anyway they want, and that's fine but states can't violate their constitution (Virginia)
3.You can't change an unconditional map close to an election (Louisiana) except when you can (Louisiana) and you can't stop an election to change the map(Virginia), except when you can(Louisiana).
4. You can't change a map to discriminate against race(Louisiana), but the groups discriminated against have to prove INTENT(the entire country), except when you tell everyone watching FOX news that you are changed the map to discriminate against race(Texas). that's not proof of intent.
The moral of the story was written 200 years ago. "Never be deceived that the rich will allow you to vote away their wealth.""
