By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
HoloDust on 07 May 2026
Edit Thread
Soundwave said:
HoloDust said:

I'd say that OG XBOX stopped Sony from having monopoly in that market, gave alternative platform to devs (especially PC devs) and set the stage for both 360 and the way how consoles are designed in the future (as PCs in the box). So, from my POV, it did its job fairly well.

GameCube just would have sold more if there was no XBox. 

GameCube had a lot of good things going for it including significantly better hardware than the PS2, it just got drowned out by too many systems all trying to basically do the same thing and MS willing to lose like $120/system back then. 

No XBox and people would've come around to the GameCube having some really strong exclusives (Metroid Prime, Resident Evil 4, Wind Waker, etc.), better graphics than the PS2, and easier to program for to developers.

And yet, MS, going into panic mode, saw only Sony and PS2 as a Trojan horse of sorts that can threaten MS's core business. They feared that if Sony "owned" the living room with a device that didn't run Windows, developers would stop writing software for PCs and start writing for Sony’s proprietary architecture and could eventually move into the office. Yeah, I know...seems crazy from this POV, yet XBOX was born out of it.

As I said, from my perspective, it did what it was intended to do - stop Sony's monopoly, not just gamer wise, but more importantly developer wise, offered platform to PC devs and paved way to both how consoles and games for them are made in the future. No, it didn't do what Sony did to Nintendo with PS1, but I doubt anyone expected that exact result back then anyway.