Mnementh said:
Freedoms make no sense in the context of instance that cannot be free or unfree. Can you threaten a company, kill it, torture it, intimidate it — all the stuff done to restrict freedoms? Applying a concept for self-determined beings like humans onto an institution that isn't like a company makes no sense at all. Freedoms can indeed though applied to humans, including the freedom to want to immerse into sensitive artistic content. |
If you don't agree with the semantics of the word freedom in the context of institutions you can use whatever terminology you see more fit to "the right of running their bussines whatever they see fit, as long it's not illegal"
