IvoYarido said:
I understand the concern, but the system is the way it is to allow for the rankings to keep moving at a reasonable pace and attempt to be fair. If we had it at one step above only, people would be screwed if someone went on vacation or hiatus. Punishing someone who didn't play? Well if the 2nd place person went on a weeks vacation they could be knocked off the rankings list with enough activity. No matter what system we use something isn't going to be fair with it. We've just decided to stick with what we, in our opinion, believe to be fairest. If your rankings changed, your time to rematch is cleared I believe. If it were entirely up to me, I'd change the system to a biweekly tournament for points to assign rankings and drop the challenging nonsense. As it stands I work with 4 other people and I'm only really in charge of the rule set. I still think the initial rankings should have been assigned by a round robin points tournament rather then opinion, but oh well.
|
No they wouldn't. You already have the if the challenge goes unanswered within X days rule.







