Vinther1991 said:
It would of course be less safe. And to be clear I am also not shedding any tears for the psychopaths in the Iranian elite that are are now diseased. But that Iran were actually about to get nukes is just not true. They have enriched uranium to an extent that suggests that they might, but are still lacking core capabilities necessary to build such weapons. The enrichment is likely to put pressure on the US, who, as we all hopefully remember, decided to throw away a nuclear agreement that served its purpose. What is the end goal of this war exactly? The attacks are not targeting the enrichment infrastructure exclusively. Does the war even weaken the Iranian regime? I don’t think so. |
US, EU and IAEA all thought/reported they were most certainly making progress towards weapon grade U-235. Granted many thought Iraq had WOMD... so, hell. Don't know what to think.
End goal, no idea. Based on Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc... I'm not exactly thrilled. Not sure there are any good answers on this one, just my 2 cents.
Thanks for the response, much appreciated.
Edit
I try to look on the bright side. Iran is likely having major setbacks on weapons development and Trump's approval rating (and GoP in general) is failing. Will we get super lucky and Iran will be setback while also having a shift in US politics this November? I sure as **** hope both happen.







