Would you be okay with graphics staying at PS4/XBO level if it meant cheaper games and shorter dev times?

[Chrkeller]

PAOerfulone said:

Chrkeller said:

Not sure I follow.  You are ok with graphics not moving forward but want 4k?  The ps5 rarely even gets close to 4k resolution, unless running at 30 fps.  Spiderman 2, as an example, is 1080p to 1440p in performance mode.  4k/60 fps will require a ps6 with way more power.  4k/120fps, ps6 won't even do that.  My 4090 can't even do that in most cases.  I can get 1440p/120 fps in most games.  

Perhaps 4k wasn't quite what I was looking for, you're right.

1080p-1440p and 60fps should be more than enough for all games. Even 30fps is fine as long as it's consistent and smooth.

Obviously, if a game is capable of 90 or even 120fps, the devs should certainly do it. Shoot, I'd even be happy to settle for 720p-900p if it means games like Smash Bros, Spider-Man, the sports games, and FPS genres run at a consistent 120fps.

I find that a fair position.  I think 1440p is plenty.  4k just takes resources that dont add much.  I would easily sacrifice graphical settings and resolution for 120 fps.  I greatly prefer prime 4 at 120 fos.