Would you be okay with graphics staying at PS4/XBO level if it meant cheaper games and shorter dev times?

[Manlytears]

curl-6 said:

Cerebralbore101 said: 

I don't think framerate and resolution are what Curl is talking about here.

Yeah when I made the thread I was thinking more of things like model/texture quality, detail, effects, etc.

That's also my position.

In my humble opinion, FPS is misleading when judging a game's visuals; 120fps doesn't make an absolutely outdated game like Prime 4 look good.

Something similar applies to resolution. There's a minimum standard for a good presentation, but high resolution doesn't make something ugly like Pokémon acceptable.

A game with the graphical level of The Last of Us Part II/RDR II is good enough for me; FPS and resolution are another matter. Visuals on par with the games mentioned would already satisfy me; them reaching 60-120 fps and at 1080p (+ upscaling ) or higher would be good enough.