| Soundwave said: The fun thing about having actual games as proof is not having to listen to dumb opinions on what "PS4 performance" even means and how that supposedly relates to the Switch 2. It's nice to have the system out and have game announcements and releases that can do all the talking and not have to listen to just amateur hour opinions. |
Apologies if your reply was not a response to my post its just it reads like it is and was directly below it. My comment being mainly related to CPU performance and your reply focusing purely on GPU architecture which isn't relevant to my posting about the very low CPU resources of the Switch 2. Lets not forget though that PS4 easily beats the Switch 2 in some regards with its specification. It has much higher gflops performance with regard the portable performance of Switch 2 which at peak is likely 1.2/1.3 Teraflops but in real terms off battery likely well below 1 Teraflop so in that regard the Switch 2 is not a portable PS4 plus of course the PS4 has 176GB/s of memory bandwidth about 75% faster than docked Switch 2 and about 2.5x portable mode and the upscaling of Switch 2 is not without cost, we are seeing many Switch 2 games with fairly high input lag. The PS4 was far superior in achieving lower input lag than Switch 2 in many of its games.
The way it seems is that heavy use of DLSS creates games with high input lag where as games using conventional basic upscaling or no upscaling are more responsive. We have seen conversions to Switch 2 inferior to PS4 like Tomb Raider, Skyrim and a few others.
Whoever you are replying too your replies are incredibly childish in nature, almost angry and its just a discussion about the performance of consoles. I see little point getting so upset and worked up about a game console. I have multiple game consoles and have no loyalty to any of these companies but I do like to rationally discuss the hardware capabilities of consoles.
