By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
Machiavellian said:

I would be more accepting of that stance if all you have is a switch 2 or that you primarily game mobile.  Having multiple systems like I do, the Switch is the last console I would look to play games that look and play much better on other systems.  Since I only use my switch as a console, its definitely not my go to for 3rd party games.

Also we definitely know the switch 2 port would look subpar because we have enough games that have made the jump to the switch 2 that look subpar compared to the PS5, Xbox series X or PC.  As I stated, what is the use case for the switch to the consumer who purchases it is the bigger question.

There are other Switch users who don't have another current gen platform though, and yet others who value portability over fidelity.

A game running on Switch 2 is naturally not gonna look on par with PS5/PC/etc, because portable hardware is necessarily less capable than dedicated consoles. People know going into Switch 2 that it's not going to look high end.

I did specify that you would need to only be a switch 2 owner.  In that scenerio I agree but how many only switch 2 owners care about COD.  If you care about playing COD, there is a very high chance you would not be a switch 2 only owner because well COD hasn't been on the platform for years.  I am just thinking about the demographics of the community and the chances of the 2 meeting up is very slim.  Also, just my personal opinion of course but the switch in handheld mode controls just isn't suited for any decent length of time playing FPS.  I would not say I hate the controls but for a person with decent size hands it becomes crap very quick.

As to your 2nd paragraph well that proves my point.  The switch 2 use case for a game like COD is very small if you ask me for the demographic that uses the device.  Do not get me wrong, COD probably will sell decently but nowhere close to PC, PS5 or Series X levels.