firebush03 said:
I agree up until the part about “Metroid is doomed if this games flops!”. Nintendo has a very consistent history not of dropping franchises with entries which underperform, but of reassessing the tried formulas and studying ways in which they can breath new life into them. To list just a few examples of this: (i) The Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword -> Breath of the Wild, (ii) Mario Party 9/10 -> SMParty/MPSuperstars/SMParty:Jamboree, (iii) PM:Sticker Star/Color Splash -> PM:TOK/TTYDRemake, (iv) DKCReturns/TF -> DKBananza, (v) NewSMB -> SMBWonder, (vi) SF64 -> SFAdventure -> SFAssault -> SFZero, (vii) Kirby64 -> Kirby:RtDL && Kirby:SA -> Kirby:atFL And so on. If F-Zero 99, Famicon Detective Club, Kirby Air Riders, Advanced Wars 1+2 Remake, etc., aren’t evidence enough that Nintendo isn’t fully focused on only the heaviest of heavy-hitters, then I don’t know what is. Metroid has been a working project at Nintendo since the 80s: it is 100% here to stay. And chances are, following the critical reception of MP4:Beyond and Nintendo’s apparent shame of this title, I could see the next 3D Metroid being a veeeery big step forward for the franchise. Something on par with DKBananza or KirbyATFL for their respective franchises. |
The problem is all those franchises you listed have historically been much more successful than Metroid. There’s a reason it’s been 20 years between 3D Metroid games (and Dread was a 10+ year gap between any new entry). This franchise always kind of hangs by a thread as to whether or not Nintendo will deem it worthwhile to do another one. In the past it’s mostly been saved by great reception among the public who do play them to the games. But without that this time, it could be a different story. We will absolutely get a Dread follow up from Mercury Steam though, so not like the whole franchise is dead now either way.







