An unpopular opinion perhaps, but DLSS and frame gen have been very useful to me with my RTX 4060, so they definitely increase the value of Nvidia cards in my books. AMD is catching up for sure, but it's 'catching up', not 'caught up', and that includes years worth of previously released games too. I hate that DLSS and frame gen are relied on so heavily, but here we are - ignoring them would be worse to me than using them. I imagine I'm not the only one to think this way.
Personally Cities: Skylines 2 is also something that really makes me favour Nvidia over AMD... DLSS at 1080p sucks in the game, but once I discovered DLAA, I don't think I'd want to go back to not using it. I'm not sure if AMD has anything equivalent, but since the game only supports an older version of FXR, I imagine it's not going to help much. Why DLAA? Well, the game has some flickering issues at sunrise and sunset, which DLSS and DLAA fixes. I think temporal AA also does the same, but it looks like garbage. I love the game, but it definitely has its quirks... The first one had pretty consistent quality, but the second one is much more uneven (the good parts are better, but some parts are definitely worse).
...Oh, and Cities: Skylines 2 also has a free weekend on Steam right now, in case anyone cares. Probably not the best marketing speech above, I guess. :)







