By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zkuq on 12 October 2025
Edit Thread
ST.Tachyon said:
Zkuq said:

Games are meant to be what the creators want them to be, and gamers are supposed to vote with their wallets. Saying otherwise about what games are or are not supposed to be is nigh politics.

Assassin's Creed wouldn't be Assassin's Creed without the historical/real world aspect. If you create something that's similar to Assassin's Creed but has no connection to the real world, it's not really Assassin's Creed anymore. That's certainly fine, but at that point, it probably shouldn't be called Assassin's Creed.

Again, its called Video Game, you know "Game".

I have 0 interest in politics and even less for american politics that doesnt concern me at all. 

You are right, its up to developers and what they want to make, and it up to me if i will support them or not. And since Ubisoft will most likely be owned by Tencent at the end of fiscal year, i am glad that most gamers think the same way as me.

A game is something that is played, by some loose definition of 'play'. There are all sorts of games, some deeply rooted in the real world, politics, and some neither. I don't like all games either, but I don't think it's my business to say they're something games are not 'supposed' to be.