By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
Vodacixi said:

I don't know what happened there xD

To summarize: Xenoblade X (a Wii U game) had Oblivia, a huge and detailed desert area that you could traverse with a giant mech. I think even by Switch standards and even considering the framerate difference between both games, the desert in Metroid Prime 4 looks a bit bland and lacking in detail. And the contrast in graphics and detail between the "main" areas and the desert is quite stricking.

There's multiple layers to this; on the one hand, just in terms of function, Oblivia is an environment that's meant to be full of resources to collect and enemies to fight, so it makes sense for it to be more packed full of stuff; if Prime 4's desert is more something to be traversed at high speed to get to the next point of interest, then it simply wouldn't need to be as full of "stuff" that would only get in the way or slow you down.

On a technical level, I would say that the lighting in Prime 4's desert does look much better than Xenoblade X's, and if indeed this does run at 60fps on Switch 1, including in portable mode where it has similar raw power to Wii U, then having less stuff could simply be necessary to maintain performance. 30fps as X does gives you twice as much headroom in that regard.

While mecanically it doesn't need to have as much stuff, visually would make a huge difference.

It's 30VS60 fps, sure. But it's also 900p VS 1080p and 720p VS 600p. Xenoblade also has quite more stuff going on in terms of structures, landmarks, etc.