US Politics |OT|

[sc94597]

EricHiggin said:

sc94597 said:

Living and having a transgender partner doesn't mean you are left-wing. Otherwise, all of Blair White's boyfriends would be left-wing. 

There are plenty of hyper-masc (or aspirationally hyper-masc), right-wingers who fetishize transgender people. You can go on Grindr and find half a dozen of them in 30 minutes. Many have American flags in their bios, which implies they're right-wing/conservative in that context (or they travel abroad often and they're expressing that they're American, but usually the prior.) 

Not saying that this is the case here, but having a trans partner isn't as much of a political-identifier in the U.S as you would think. No more or less than Kirk having a black best friend (Candace Owens) means he wasn't racist toward black women. 

Being DJT doesn't make him Rep, Con, or Nazi. Politicians change parties because they were always politically closeted or just flat out full of sh*t.

If we only had solid evidence through decent enough reporting, something greatly lacking for decades, we'd all know for certain what he falls under.

As for the MSM, can't be sure which side they're on either...

Not saying anything is the case, but...

Correct. Being DJT in 1995 didn't make him a Republican, Conservative, or Nazi. Being DJT in 2025 means he is a Republican (because he explicitly chose that affiliation), and fascist (because he subscribes, albeit inconsistently/self-interestedly, to an ideology of palingenetic ultranationalism in the form of "make America great again") 

The mainstream corporate media is biased toward the established center of power, whomever that might be at any time. They're certainly not professing "the liberation of the working class is the job of the worker alone."