TheMisterManGuy said:
In regards to what Charlie said about the Civil Rights Act, He's right. The CRA was a mistake, and that's a view shared by most libertarians. You don't need a federal law to protect individual rights of minorities, when freedom of association and the free market will already take care of that. Hell, I'd argue the Civil rights act is one of the reasons behind DEI mandates of modern times. Kirk wasn't advocating against groups of people having rights. He was advocating for government to stop enacting nonsense laws like the CRA to fix problems that natural rights of citizens and the free market could already fix. |
I’m having a hard time comprehending the stupidity of this post……..we don’t need laws protecting individual rights because the free market will take care of that? What the fuck are you going on about?
Did the free market abolish slavery? Did it bring about women’s suffrage? Did it regulate child labor? Did it provide the elderly with pensions & healthcare? Did it legalize gay marriage? Did it protect the disabled? Did it attempt to clean up the air & water?
The “free market” doesn’t give a fuck about anybody’s individual rights, it cares about selling goods and turning profits.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.







