the-pi-guy said:
Which I didn't say that they did. I wouldn't treat Microsoft in 1975, the same way I do in 2025. They have much more power and influence, and they have much less risk today. I think they should pay be willing to pay back what society has supported them to have. Particularly so other people can make similar "risks".  It's only a risk, if there's something to lose. What do you think he would have lost if it didn't work out? And why do you think that? |
I think when someone places a big bet that pays off, good for them.
I'm not a gates historian so no idea. I know what I would lose and it is a shit ton of money and time that would hinder future wealth.
Why do you feel entitled to a payout when someone gambles their money and you don't have a chip on the table?
Last edited by Chrkeller - on 11 September 2025|
i7-13700k |
|
Vengeance 32 gb |
|
RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC |
Switch OLED







